Heinlein Readers Discussion Group
Thursday 10-23-2003 9:00 P.M. EDT
Time Travel vs. Free Will; is there really a conflict?
Here Begin The Postings
Subject: RAH-AIM Readers Group chat meeting–“Time Travel vs. Free Will; is there really a conflict?” — Oct. 23, 25.
Date: Sunday, September 21, 2003 10:24 PM
The next RAH-AIM Readers Group chat will be “Time Travel vs. Free Will; is there really a conflict?”, scheduled for October 23 and 25, 8pm and 4pm U.S. Central Time (respectively). Anyone wishing to join us for the first time can find out how by visiting http://heinleinsociety.org/Archives/ReadersGrp/index.html#Info .
Dr. Rufo has put together an excellent lead-off for us this time:
The protagonists in the stories and novels of RAH are almost invariably of the “can-do” variety. They are imposed upon, maligned, or, at the very least, somehow threatened in the maintenance of their personal status quo. In response to these “interesting situations,” his characters are notoriously able to overcome their oppressors. Sometimes to the extent of “changing the(ir) world,” or even, moving to another world or worlds! Clearly RAH’s sympathies extend to demonstrations that “[no one can] enslave a free man; the very most you can do is kill him! ”
Yet there seems to exist an interesting contradiction within some of RAH’s works, that is, in the stories which involve time travel. At least, in those stories which involve time travel into the *past* rather than into the *future*. It appears that when a RAH character slips into his own (or his timeline’s) past there are limitations placed that preclude the otherwise successful Heinlein outcome. In these stories, nothing the protagonist attempts makes any effective change in his situation. There appear to be clear demonstrations of the character’s “free will” yet, no matter the choices made or un-made, the resolution is inevitably the situation as originally stated.
In “By His Bootstraps,” the central character is literally “all” of the important characters in the story. Bob is Bob is Bob is Bob is Diktor is Bob is Diktor. The same is true of “All You Zombies. . .” The Unwed Mother is Jane is her Seducer who is later recruited to the Time Corps is the Bartender who recruits him is the Thief who steals the infant born is the infant born and stolen and placed as “Jane” is the much-experienced Time Agent. The “twist of the wrist” of these stories is the reader’s discovery of this situation. But is there also a statement made that the past is immutable?
In “Farnham’s Freehold,” Hugh is offered the opportunity to re-enter the time-stream into his own past. Interestingly, his alternative to this acceptance is the probable execution of his second family. He returns to the past and knocks on his own door so that he (re-)creates the earlier-described situation where he is on *both* sides of the door. The change is that the second time he is aware of this. The most notable alteration is not of his own creation: Barbara’s car now has a manual transmission which is more suitable for driving “into the mountains” than the automatic transmission she had in the first go-round.
This small change (a “machina ex deus?”) assists Hugh in getting his new family safely into hiding from the Grand Slam that moves the story into the future at the start of the novel. Granted, the end of the novel can be read as a real “flag-waver” but is it *clear* that substantive change is/will be made?
Does the existence of Farnham’s Freehold at the ending of the novel suggest that the world of Ponse is eradicated or is it that the Farnham’s of the second go-round will likely be the “wild” critters who Ponse poaches and brings in to “improve the blood-lines” of his slaves?
There is a part of the Heinlein reader(ship) that screams that Ponse is gone. There are others who suggest the inevitability of the second-stated possibility. Can one hold both opinions? What was RAH’s intent?
Well, what do you think? I have laid it out in a fairly straightforward way but I think there are sufficient “loopholes”/gaping wounds for a discussion to get going. Please let me know your opinion(s) at your earliest convenience.
So let’s all take a look at Bootstraps, Zombies, Freehold, and anything else that strikes our fancies and talk it out for a while. Then I’ll see you Oct. 23 and 25 for the chats.
Oscagne, High Priest of Skeptics and Cynics
wanna read a story? http://users.ev1.net/~mcgrew/mss
or see my goofy website? http://users.ev1.net/~mcgrew/webpage/home.htm
From: LV Poker Player
Subject: Re: RAH-AIM Readers Group chat meeting–“Time Travel vs. Free Will; is there really a conflict?” — Oct. 23, 25.
Date: Sunday, September 21, 2003 11:22 PM
> Does the existence of Farnham’s Freehold at the ending of the novel
>suggest that the world of Ponse is eradicated or is it that the
>Farnham’s of the second go-round will likely be the “wild” critters who
>Ponse poaches and brings in to “improve the blood-lines” of his slaves?
> There is a part of the Heinlein reader(ship) that screams that Ponse
>is gone. There are others who suggest the inevitability of the
>second-stated possibility. Can one hold both opinions? What was RAH’s
It has always been my opinion that the timeline split, with the Ponse universe still existing plus the new one created by Hugh and Barbara.
Ferengi rule of acquisition #192: Never cheat a Klingon…unless you’re sure
you can get away with it.From: David Wright
Subject: Re: RAH-AIM Readers Group chat meeting–“Time Travel vs. Free Will; is there really a conflict?” — Oct. 23, 25.
Date: Sunday, September 21, 2003 11:43 PM
>> Does the existence of Farnham’s Freehold at the ending of the novel
>>suggest that the world of Ponse is eradicated or is it that the
>>Farnham’s of the second go-round will likely be the “wild” critters who
>>Ponse poaches and brings in to “improve the blood-lines” of his slaves?
>> There is a part of the Heinlein reader(ship) that screams that Ponse
>>is gone. There are others who suggest the inevitability of the
>>second-stated possibility. Can one hold both opinions? What was RAH’s
>It has always been my opinion that the timeline split, with the Ponse universe
>still existing plus the new one created by Hugh and Barbara.
I don’t quite agree with you. Yes, I think that Ponse’s timeline still existed, but the world in which Barbara and Hugh returned to already changes in it and evolved differently from what they had experienced, implying that it already existed prior to their return.
— David Wright
From: baybusDON’T WANTNOSPAMcoming back, perhaps.”
Hugh’s response in this conversation is:
“Well, it is some different. You wouldn’t forget that about your own
car. And I do remember putting Grace to bed early; Duke and I had a talk
afterwards. So, it’s different.” Suddenly he grinned. “It could be
importantly different. [my added emphasis here>>] If the future can
change the past, or whatever, maybe the past can change the future, too.
Maybe the United States won’t be wholly destroyed. Maybe neither side
will be so suicidal as to use plague bombs. Maybe — Hell, maybe Ponse
will never get a chance to have teen-age girls for dinner!” He added,
“I’m damn’ well going to make a try! To see that he doesn’t.” [end my
What do you think?
From: baybusDON’T WANTNOSPAM
Date: Monday, September 22, 2003 1:06 AM
>>> Does the existence of Farnham’s Freehold at the ending of the novel
>>>suggest that the world of Ponse is eradicated or is it that the
>>>Farnham’s of the second go-round will likely be the “wild” critters who
>>>Ponse poaches and brings in to “improve the blood-lines” of his slaves?
>>> There is a part of the Heinlein reader(ship) that screams that Ponse
>>>is gone. There are others who suggest the inevitability of the
>>>second-stated possibility. Can one hold both opinions? What was RAH’s
>>It has always been my opinion that the timeline split, with the Ponse universe
>>still existing plus the new one created by Hugh and Barbara.
> This is obviously a valid observation/opinion when “reading-back” from
>our current vantage with our ability to see Freehold in the light of the
>works that have come after. Please remember, it was published in, IIRC,
>1963-64 and the availability of the “split in timelines” was not an
>option. In other words, of the two choices I present, which do you favor
>and why? Or, perhaps, there’s another alternative I’ve overlooked. . .
Saying that Ponse is gone leads to your classic time travel paradox: Ponse would not have sent them back, therefore he still exists in order to send them back, and around we go.
That only leaves the idea that Hugh and Barbara’s descendants became the wild ones. I think this works without a paradox, but I just don’t like it.
Are you sure that alternate timelines were unknown in science fiction back then? They at least had the concept of quantum mechanics, I think that was developed in the thirties and forties.
Ferengi rule of acquisition #192: Never cheat a Klingon…unless you’re sure
you can get away with it.
From: “David Wright”
Subject: Re: RAH-AIM Readers Group chat meeting–“Time Travel vs. Free Will;
Date: Monday, September 22, 2003 6:05 AM
>Are you sure that alternate timelines were unknown in science fiction back
>then? They at least had the concept of quantum mechanics, I think that was
>developed in the thirties and forties.
Everett’s dissertation on ‘The Many Worlds’ interpretation of quantum physics was written in 1957.
From: “David Wright”
Subject: Re: RAH-AIM Readers Group chat meeting–“Time Travel vs. Free Will; is there really a conflict?” — Oct. 23, 25.
Date: Monday, September 22, 2003 8:48 AM
>The next RAH-AIM Readers Group chat will be “Time Travel vs. Free Will; is
>there really a conflict?”, scheduled for October 23 and 25, 8pm and 4pm U.S.
>Central Time (respectively). Anyone wishing to join us for the first time
>can find out how by visiting
> In “By His Bootstraps,” the central character is literally “all”
>of the important characters in the story. Bob is Bob is Bob is Bob is
>Diktor is Bob is Diktor. The same is true of “All You Zombies. . .” The
>Unwed Mother is Jane is her Seducer who is later recruited to the Time
>Corps is the Bartender who recruits him is the Thief who steals the
>infant born is the infant born and stolen and placed as “Jane” is the
>much-experienced Time Agent. The “twist of the wrist” of these stories
>is the reader’s discovery of this situation. But is there also a
>statement made that the past is immutable?
It is clear in the text of BYB, that Bob does exactly the same thing each time through the cycle. He tries to vary things, but each time, circumstances combine so that he makes the identical ‘choices’ that he has/will observe(d) in the actions of the other ‘Bobs’. Does this mean he has no ‘free will’. My take on it is yes, he has ‘free will’, but that ‘free will’ inevitably leads him to make only those choices that have/will occur(red).
This is the way that I phrased it in my article in The Heinlein Journal:
“The first of these is the predestination versus free will question. I don’t really see
this as a logic problem except that logically one viewpoint would seem to exclude the other.
The only answer I see to this is what is demonstrated by the choices that Bob Wilson makes
in “Bootstraps”. From the outside of the system looking in, these choices would appear to be
predestined, but from the inside, from Bob’s viewpoint at every point in the loops, he is
free to make any choice he wants. But because of all of the conditions, his own mindset, the
actions of the other Bobs and everything else he chooses the same course which he had seen
himself make on previous loops.
BTW, I have timelines for both BYB and AYZ at http://dwrighsr.tripod.com/heinlein/TimeLines.htm
Here Begins the Discussion Log
You have just entered room “Heinlein Readers Group Chat.”
OscagneTX: So its best to break your messages up a litle bit.
DavidWrightSr: Made it that time
OscagneTX: That worked.
OscagneTX: I still don’t know WTF “OnlineHost” is. I’ve never seen it before.
OscagneTX: Kate, what client are you using? AIM, or are you on AOL, or that new chat thingy that can chat on all the networks?
DavidWrightSr: I don’t see ‘Online etc’
OscagneTX: Ok. That may be why you’re listed as “UnsupportedSN1” to me.
OscagneTX: You don’t see nicknames in front of the comments?
OscagneTX: Oh… you’re on a mac?
Dehede011 has entered the room.
Dehede011: how goes the dawn.
OscagneTX: I have no experience with Mac chat proggies, except for IRC (Internet Relay Chat).
OscagneTX: Last time I saw Dawn she was working in a Chinese take-out joint.
DavidWrightSr: Kate. We don’t see any balloons on AIM, just the name
EBATNM has entered the room.
Dehede011: I always wanted to take out a Chinese but she always said no.
EBATNM: Hi David, It’s Elaine, not Andy. and I’m on another IM. Andy may get on later.
EBATNM has left the room.
NuclearWasteUSN has entered the room.
NuclearWasteUSN: Good evening all
jilyd has entered the room.
NuclearWasteUSN: I would be Jim, Kate. 🙂
NuclearWasteUSN: I have a macabre sense of humor, thus the moniker
OscagneTX: howdy guys.
NuclearWasteUSN: Hello Dee. LTNS
OscagneTX: Anybody have any experience with ichat for Mac?
DavidWrightSr: David Silver is the only one I know with a MAC
NuclearWasteUSN: Just a sec, I have teachers in the family, let me see if one is on.
NuclearWasteUSN: Yes, sorry Kate.
Dehede011: brb, getting sandwich and and tea.
NuclearWasteUSN: I sometimes speak in shorthand on here.
NuclearWasteUSN: Then again, it was a bad habit I learned while TAD to comsublant, so it isn’t my fault.
jilyd: Kate, I am Dee. Hi!
NuclearWasteUSN: Temporarily assigne duty
jilyd: Jim, I thought you got the memo prohibiting the TLAs. 🙂
NuclearWasteUSN: I am still laghing over my little brother’s “WWWDWA”
OscagneTX: They’re yanking your chain, I think, Kate.
jilyd: Three Letter Acronyms.
NuclearWasteUSN: My little brother wrote a missive the other night detailing 87 reasons why he would not reenlist in the Navy
OscagneTX: No More Acronyms You Insensitive Bastards.
NuclearWasteUSN: Number 53 or so was WWWDWA or What Would We Do Without Acronyms
jilyd: That’s bastard and bitch, thank you very much! 😀 Reedman1956 has entered the room.
NuclearWasteUSN: I guess you had to read the letter
Copycat669 has entered the room.
Copycat669: hiya all
NuclearWasteUSN: So, David, how are you this fine cool evening?
NuclearWasteUSN: Hello copycat
jilyd: He may have been looking for some other group. Had some squatters a few weeks back.
OscagneTX: Kate, most folks are using the AIM program, not Ichat. We don’t see talk-balloons, just text.
Copycat669: Purple? Holy CATS! didn’t do it on purpose! not sure
NuclearWasteUSN: Oscagne, sorry, that is a negative on the Mac staff. If you tell me what you need I can see what I get from them tomorrow
DavidWrightSr: There should be an option somewhere, Kate, that you can modify to show names.
NuclearWasteUSN: Kate, if you get any AOL product to work correctly you will be doing better than the designers.
OscagneTX: NW, Kate is using Ichat, and it signed her in as “UnsupportedSN1”, it won’t show her who is saying which comment, and I think it signed on something called “OnlineHost” because I’ve never seen that before she joined.
OscagneTX: Tadaa! Dancing Rodents.
NuclearWasteUSN: A whole line of ’em
OscagneTX: Conga Rats.
DavidWrightSr: Conga Rats!
DavidWrightSr: Great Minds Think Alike
NuclearWasteUSN: I fix hardware problems on Macs, and I do minor OS surgery only. Other than that I do a reinstall.
NuclearWasteUSN: Great minds think alike
Merfilly27 has entered the room.
DavidWrightSr: Nah. You’ll fit right in
NuclearWasteUSN: Heya Mer.
jilyd: Hi, steph.
Merfilly27: hello one and all
OscagneTX: Dont’ worry about it, Kate. I’ve been chatting online for 5 or 6 years, actually met my wife that way, and I don’t know all the appropriate acronyms yet.
NuclearWasteUSN: Kate, if you can ignore me tweaking your nose on the group, you are doing just fine 🙂
OscagneTX: Howdy, Merf. How’s the offsprings doing?
Merfilly27: brb…kids to bed down
Merfilly27 has left the room.
DavidWrightSr: BRB (Be Right Back)
Dehede011: Hi Steph
NuclearWasteUSN: Although, if I had known you were a Maccy and a liberal I would have tweaked harder. 😉
OscagneTX: A liberal? Does that mean “spread on thickly”?
Dehede011: Classical Liberal or this new fangled group
Copycat669: what’s a maccy?
NuclearWasteUSN: User of Apple products
: Or did you use “liberal” in the Shakespearean sense of “bawdy” – “What liberal shepherds give a grosser name / But our cold maids do ‘dead men’s fingers’ call it” – somewhere in HAMLET, don’t ask me where at the moment.
Copycat669: Do you have to be a WILLING user of Apple products?
NuclearWasteUSN: Geeze, Kate, even I have voted for Democrats I respected.
NuclearWasteUSN: Cal Dooley springs to mind, but don’t tell David I said so.
NuclearWasteUSN: And I never use the English meaning for anything.
NuclearWasteUSN: Which last comment?
NuclearWasteUSN: Not a problem.
pjscott100 has entered the room.
NuclearWasteUSN: In chat you learn to read what people mean, and not what they type.
pjscott100:80% of communication is non-verbal…
pjscott100: … the tone of voice could have had a great deal to do with it
DavidWrightSr: except on chats and newsgroups O:-)
OscagneTX: kate, that’s a perfect example. Unless you mean *I* might get hurt saying them.
LV Poker Player: In today’s society, it shouldn’t get much of a response. As David pointed out, this was a world of sexual suppression, so just referring to sex might have done it
OscagneTX: If someone walked up to me in public and said “You’re a Nazi child-abuser.” I would probably laugh.
OscagneTX: If I walked up to a person and said the same thing, and they got offended; they’re giving me power by reacting to my stupid statement.
Merfilly27: How ’bout an adoptee finding out becaue his supposed sister blurts it out in the middle of an argument?
OscagneTX: At that point, though, it’s not the words that are important, it’s the accusation.
Merfilly27: but it is still words, and worse, the truth
OscagneTX: He could just as well say, ‘You follow a National Socialist policy and have aberrent sex with underage persons.” and it would cause me just as much trouble.
DavidWrightSr: What hurts the most is when it is the truth. A truth that we don’t want to hear.
LV Poker Player: I didn’t mean to start a major off topic digression
Merfilly27: sorry man…I was biting my tongue, proverbially, becasue I saw something in FF that is also off topic
OscagneTX: Yup. Words from my wife could hurt. Words from my Dad or Mom could hurt. But it really wouldn’t be the words, it would be they’re thoughts about me and the fact I care what they think.
Merfilly27: I can’t spell ‘because’
OscagneTX: Steph, what did you see in FF?
Merfilly27: I looked at the publication date…then it clicked why RAH made such a point of race in it, and racial stereotypes
Merfilly27: 1964….Civil rights movement
OscagneTX: I care what they think. That means I’m letting them affect me.
Merfilly27: am I off base?
OscagneTX: absolutely, Merf.
OscagneTX: I was amazed he could sell a book with that theme then.
Merfilly27: it specifically caught my eye that Joe was in school
Merfilly27: I see that Kate
OscagneTX: I feel that lack on a regular basis. I miss all his biblical references because I only read enough of it to turn me off to it.
DavidWrightSr: I never considered FF to be about race, but about power.
: Read that Bible even if it hurts – “it does contain practical advice for most situations” (Jubal Harshaw) and RAH had it quite high up on his “Desert Island” list of ten books to take with you from a shipwreck.
Merfilly27: Barbara is the blank slate
LV Poker Player: If you meet a witch, don’t suffer him/her to live?
LV Poker Player: Yeah, I’ve never really tried to count which ones make sense versus not. I just make my own decisions and don’t worry about it
Merfilly27: Hugh = heart,mind,spirit in my name book
Merfilly27: Hubert is those plus bright or famous
Merfilly27: Karen is pure, unsullied
Merfilly27: I’m not sure…my surnames book went missing and I can’t afford a new one
Merfilly27: But she is the “sacrifice”
LV Poker Player: You know, I think the character I most identify with, and sympathize the most with, is Grace
pjscott100: spelling is Ponce in that case
DavidWrightSr: Kate. Not Farnsworth-Jones, but Farthingwaite-Jones.
pjscott100: well, but doesn’t mean “pimp” though… means fairy, poofter, etc
LV Poker Player: Not exactly like. She obviously was insane. She lost touch with reality. She was not in control of herself, and was not being bitchy out of selfish reasons or anything. She truly though Hugh could have called a doctor
LV Poker Player: And that he should have
LV Poker Player: I think we both have a pretty good idea what it is like to percieve the world differently from neurotypicals, and the problems that can cause
Merfilly27: It has often been pointed out to me that Grace was a look at Leslyn…But I lack data
LV Poker Player: If I remember right, those guys were just naive and gullible. They did not actually see those outlets.
pjscott100: I thought that about Grace & Leslyn too, but when I brought it up to Doc James he said he’d asked Ginny about it and she said No
OscagneTX: Leslyn had some other distasteful habits too, no?
Merfilly27: Iwas thinking it referred to her change…25 years earlier to then
OscagneTX: Didn’t Asimov say that during dinner (even formal) she would chain-smoke and stubb out the cigarettes on the edge of her plate?
Merfilly27: ooh a peeve of mine!
LV Poker Player: She was neurotypical (NT) for the first part of her life. By the time she was demanding that Hugh call a doctor, something had slipped. Maybe too many fried brain cells from drinking, maybe too much stress from the new situation,
LV Poker Player: maybe too much stress from an unhappy marriage, probably some comibination
OscagneTX: I think she just slipped her gears. It happens, people can’t cope, they don’t decide anything, they just stop being in touch with reality.
LV Poker Player: Like I said the hikers were naive and gullible, maybe to the point of not being NT, but that is a different scale from Grace’s lack of touch with reality
OscagneTX: I mean… as far as they know they’re the sole survivors of a nuclear blast, and she wants Hugh to call a doctor with a telephone. And can’t understand why he won’t.
OscagneTX: I thought the hikers were just really stupid.
OscagneTX: “Mother Nature’s only capitol crime”
Merfilly27: Iwent hiking wit a city girl once
Merfilly27: she did not know how to relieve herself out in nature
LV Poker Player: I agree with oscagne
OscagneTX: Of course you do. “The true test of a person’s intelligence is how much they agree with you.”
OscagneTX: Anyway. I’ve always been fascinated with Heinlein’s solution to the grandfather problem. Does it bother anyone that that solution effectively eliminates free will (at least retroactively)?
: Yes, I think everyone SHOULD learn how to deal without toilet-paper when s/he has to. Have you ever camped with someone who WOULD NOT bury refuse (human-excreted or other) because “that’s not civilized”?
LV Poker Player: Haven
OscagneTX: I never have CAMP camped. Mostly car camped. But, when you gotta go, you gotta go.
Merfilly27: I was in the army…yes!
DavidWrightSr: Hazel and the twins in Rolling Stones made some comments about ‘free will’ and the ‘matrix of fixed events’ Don.t recall it exactly.
LV Poker Player: Oops, try this. Haven’t been camping since my army days. Try relieving yourself (number 2) in a blizzard. Not any fun. The joys of driving a tank…
: The matrix contains paths – you choose which path to follow, but the choices already exist as possibilities: you just decide which paths to explore, which not to (as in the RAH short story “Assignment in Eternity”)
DavidWrightSr: They spoke of both ‘free will’ and ‘predestination’ being shaky theories. IIRC.
OscagneTX: Me either. I have to keep going back to bootstraps. At each cusp the character made his own free choices. It’s only from the end of the story we see that everything was choreographed.
DavidWrightSr: Elsewhen was RAH’s first tentative steps into WAM.
OscagneTX: Remind me of that plot, please, David?
DavidWrightSr: Professor Frost taught his students how to find and explore alternate types of time. He himself had gone back in time and changed how his history developed.
OscagneTX: Ah, yes.
pjscott100: I have a soft spot for that one
OscagneTX: Me too.
OscagneTX: I like the map with hills analogy to space/time.
OscagneTX: You’re thinking of Niven’s Proxmire meets Heinlein story?
DavidWrightSr: Did you read the story about Proxmire’s sending someone back to Heinlein with a shot of penicillin so that he wouldn’t become such a prominent writer and supporter of the space program?
LV Poker Player: Deny him all access to stone masonry supplies and equipment, so that he would have to spend more time writing. 🙂
Merfilly27: I read that one
OscagneTX: David, he goes back himself. Arrives back in the scientist’s house dripping from sea spray.
DavidWrightSr: So he became a prominent Admiral and supporter of the space program.
OscagneTX: I LIKE that story. You know… if RAH could have stayed in and been an admiral (like his brother?) you just KNOW he’d give up all the writing to do it.
pjscott100: gotta go… dinner calls
Merfilly27: good night
pjscott100: actually it’s the wife doing the calling, which makes it the more important…
pjscott100: night all
pjscott100 has left the room.
Merfilly27: Until I read Heinlein’s W-A-M, I always preferred the ripple effect of time travel theory
Merfilly27: FF could be that
OscagneTX: I dunno. He valued that experience, didn’t he? Or he wouldn’t have written Take Back.
LV Poker Player: Not to mention A House Of Her Own
: I suppose so – but he could have persuaded his former self to work for some right-wing or libertarian organization instead, and written TAKE BACK out of that (and A HOUSE OF HER OWN with a different slant).
OscagneTX: oo oo oo. I caught a nit. A Bathroom of Her Own.
LV Poker Player: I have no direct evidence that the story was based on his political career, but it seems likely
LV Poker Player: err…oops
OscagneTX: Do y’all want to take a break? 5 minutes?
OscagneTX: or do we usually take 14, I can’t remember.
Merfilly27: I’m listening to my betters
OscagneTX: er 15
OscagneTX: Okay… ten minute break. Be back… 22:25 Eastern.
LV Poker Player: In the intro to Expanded Universe, he states that he hopes his non writing activities had been forgotten, or at least the the statute of limitations had run out
OscagneTX: I’m going to try one more time, Stephanie… How are the kids? Specifically the new one?
OscagneTX: If you anwered me before I missed it.
Merfilly27: Oh…they’re good…probably I missed it in the blinks of aol
OscagneTX: getting any sleep?
Merfilly27: Little Bit is fussing his socks off
Merfilly27: some nights great, some poor, but I sleep well on catnaps
OscagneTX: He’ll be the only male in the house as he grows up?
OscagneTX: You and two sisters, right?
Merfilly27: Well, there’s the dad, but he works alot
Merfilly27: Sorry it was Dad’s turn to feed him, but I had to make a bottle for that
Merfilly27: The girls are both tomboys
OscagneTX: That’ll make things easier, then. %^)
Merfilly27: No, because he would see the flip side of the coin presented there
Merfilly27: much as I keep the ringer off, it does serve to enhance life
OscagneTX: I don’t think so. Even if he stopped Bell, someone else would have put it together.
OscagneTX: He’d have had to spend his whole life putting out fires, and then no time for patients.
Merfilly27: I htink it, as much as the car, allowed for families to spread out from one another
LV Poker Player: He might be tempted, but then he would think about the number of lives saved because an ambulance could be called
Merfilly27: never could happen
Merfilly27: even in states dedicated to rational thought…salon era France, there is religion
Merfilly27: whether it is to a God, Goddess, or to an Idea, or Science
Merfilly27: there is always a crutch
Merfilly27: His was belief in his own intellect
Merfilly27: I’m not running it down, or making mockeries
Merfilly27: I think that such belief is one of the better ones to hold
OscagneTX: Can you really crutch yourself?
OscagneTX: A crutch is definitively a foreign thing, no?
Merfilly27: maybe crutch is the wrong word then
Merfilly27: I got the feeling that most of the Main Characters (even Ira Johnson) did believe in some form of Accounting
OscagneTX: No. That is totally foreign to his personality, Kate.
LV Poker Player: It’s hard to say. For one thing, where did non believers such as Ira and myself go in that universe? Remember, Marga ended up in Valhalla due to her belief in Norse mythology
Merfilly27: they just held suh things as personal and subject to revisment when the event happened
OscagneTX: That’s the whole “I may be in a wet pack in a hospital, but there’s no profit in assuming that, I have to go by my senses.”
Merfilly27: Jacob Burroughs
OscagneTX: LV, you’d have gone to hell. Not such a bad thing, really.
DavidWrightSr: I used to really dislike the concept of changeable time-lines. Then as I was writing my article, I remembered Dr. Jefferson’s comment in Between Planets about worlds which had different physical laws and suddenly the whole thing …
LV Poker Player: Apparently Yahweh was not the only deity in his creation, although he wanted people to think that
DavidWrightSr: came into focus. Why not worlds which allowed changeable time lines and worlds which didn’t .
Merfilly27: good thought David
LV Poker Player: Not a bad thing as written, but why would I necessarily end up in the Christian hell? Why not Niffleheim, the Norse equivalent?
Merfilly27: And, LV, I’m not sure I’m ready to put my heart up to the feather on the scales
OscagneTX: Yeah, but Marga was specifically imported. Everyone indigenous to Yahweh’s reality was subject to the Heaven/Hell dichotomy.
OscagneTX: Didn’t they even say that it was fair because something like 7% were able to make the cut.
OscagneTX: That puts you, me, Ira and the other 93% in Hell.
Merfilly27: If you read the Book closely, you see where translators did not eliminate all traces of the other tribal deities of the early Hebrews
: I’ll accept that Ira’d have decided “OK, I goofed – God does exist, but I’d no way of knowing for sure.” As to “what hereafter do atheists experience?” – Prof. Frost answered that one ‘way back in “Assignment in Eternity” …
Merfilly27: I figure they do die, never to experience a thing again
DDENT has entered the room.
AGplusone has entered the room.
OscagneTX: Well, and Hail, you two.
: … Prof. Frost pointed out that a human nervous system, having known throughout its existence no other state BUT existence, cannot imagine or experience “non-existence” – HI, ddent, and Dave Silver! …
OscagneTX: I think that was right.
DDENT: Hi everyone
BPRAL22169 has entered the room.
Merfilly27: hey there
OscagneTX: There ferry must have let out, everyone got here at once.
BPRAL22169: I was in a meeting with Rita Bottoms. Just got out.
BPRAL22169: David, check your e-mail
: … so, says Prof. Frost [HI, Bill!], your nervous system will come up with SOMETHING to experience even if not a classical/”standard” hereafter. WOW, what great fonts and balloon-colors the new arrivals have!
AGplusone: Just saw it, Bill.
OscagneTX: Rita Bottoms. 2nd and 3rd names? 1st name Marga?
BPRAL22169: No, so far as I know, that’s it.
BPRAL22169: Recently retired Head of Special Collections at the University Library
Merfilly27 has left the room.
OscagneTX: Yeah, but if you’ve been getting to Margarita Bottoms all night, you wouldn’t be sure about much, would you? %^)
OscagneTX: Hrm. I’m pretty convinced that when my nervous system shuts down I’m probably not going to be experiencing anything at all.
OscagneTX: Kate, you mentioned my stories in the ng… you’ve read “Goddess”?
LV Poker Player: I expect it to be somewhat similar to the way things were before I was born
: Yes, Oscagne, but will you *know* that you experience nothing? Probably not … I don’t recall reading “Goddess,” but then I haven’t yet read all your stories, Oscagne – please re-tell “Goddess” briefly here, if at all possible.
OscagneTX: I so completely ripped that concept off from RAH that I’m using it as proof of the absence of afterlife. If there were an afterlife, RAH would have come back to haunt me for stealing his story. %^)
OscagneTX: Um… lady gets a tumor and gets cryogenically preserved before she dies.
LV Poker Player: which one did you ripoff?
OscagneTX: She has nightmares for 5 billion years until the earth gets melted by the sun.
OscagneTX: Then she meets God.
OscagneTX: The reason RAH turned down cryo was “What if it interferes with reincarnation?”
DDENT has left the room.
LV Poker Player: oh, ok
LV Poker Player: Except that I think Ginny denied that he said it seriously, or believed it a possibility?
OscagneTX: I left out the really important details so the story won’t be spoiled for anyone, but those are recognisable details.
OscagneTX: Oh, yeah, he wasn’t serious. And that sure po ed some cryo fans. *giggle* But it gets the point across.
Merfilly27 has entered the room.
OscagneTX: If she lived forever because of cryogenics, it would keep her from whatever afterlife would happen.
DavidWrightSr: LL said that in TEFL also.
DavidWrightSr: When Minerva was looking for something new for him.
OscagneTX: Yeah, but it’s a more immediate problem for LL. I mean… we don’t KNOW that he’s going to die at all.
Merfilly27: afraid of missing the whole rool call event
LV Poker Player: It wasn’t reincarnation, he just worried that if there really was any kind of judgment day, he might miss it if still frozen and therefore not really dead
OscagneTX has left the room.
: … and the 2nd half of BEYOND THIS HORIZON makes reincarnation key to the plot (as absolute proof that, e.g., Theobald knows more than he could have learned in *this* lifetime – he knows what palm-trees look like, etc.)
OscagneTX has entered the room.
OscagneTX: crud. Well, at lease I saved recently.
LV Poker Player: It does? I don’t remember that in The Happy Days Ahead. Which part? I have it right here
OscagneTX: Anyway… just going from Job… if there’s a Rapture (capital R) then cryo folks have no worries as long as theyr’e saved before they freeze.
AGplusone: Let me know from where you saved to where you returned Osc, and I’ll send you the gap.
: Probably the other one, then – the EXPANDED essay from the viewpoint of a 21st-century man looking back over the horrible 20th – I forget the name, but it says “And of course we now have proved reincarnation.”
OscagneTX: They don’t have to be dead to ascend, they can be “bodily lifted to heaven” or some such.
Merfilly27 has left the room.
Merfilly27 has entered the room.
OscagneTX: No problem, Dave. I’ll email you after. LadyS122 has entered the room.
Merfilly27: Hey Helen
OscagneTX: Howdy, y’all.
OscagneTX: Is that a Spider’s Lady Sally reference, LadyS? LadyS122: I wish…. It’s an allusion to my old BBS handle, Lady Scarlet. 🙂
OscagneTX: shoot. %^) LadyS122: but I’m just plain old Helen.
OscagneTX: I was hoping you could direct me to Lady Sally’s. They seem to have a bunch of fun there.
LV Poker Player: The Third Millennium Opens, he predicted that by 2001 we would have proof of survival after death. LadyS122: if I ever find it, I’ll let you know.
AGplusone: She’s referring to the essay “The Third Millenium Opens” beginning at Pg. 310 in the new edition.
: After all, Harry Truman’s full middle name consisted of the letter S (no period, as it didn’t stand for a name, just for itself) because his family couldn’t agree which S-surnamed grandparent to honor.
DavidWrightSr: You could still abbreviate it S. couldn’t youO:-)
Merfilly27: I hate remembering names, but not the faces that go with it
LV Poker Player: Heinlein placed a lot of importance on the Bridey Murphy case, but everything I have read seems to thoroughly debunk it and all other attempts to remember previous lives. I think RAH goofed on this one
: Most of the reincarnation-regressions I have read do not convince me. However, some seem to me (in my current state of ignorance) somewhat convincing … and I’ve had odd personal experiences which I won’t discuss here.
Merfilly27: email me Kate, if you want to discuss…had some of my own
AGplusone: “It is hard to believe that it was only in 1952 that Morey Bernstein, using hypnotic regression, established the personal survival of Bridget Murphy–and thereby turned the western world to a research that Asia and Africa had …
AGplusone: always taken for granted.”
: Re name/face memory: the Mega Memory Course people gave up on me, after mucho effort from my end and from theirs. I could only improve strong areas of my memory, not weak ones – not quite what I’d hoped for.
Merfilly27: anytime…gets boring being full time mom
AGplusone: The footnote goes on to say , in 1980, he’s aware that many feel the Murphy case disproven, but he’s still not too sure about it.
LV Poker Player: I wonder if this has anything to do with Asperger’s, Kate? I have not read about this particular trait, but I am terrible at putting names to faces, even though I have good memory otherwise
Merfilly27: it always seemed to cause the Doctor some distress 🙂
Merfilly27: oh wait…that’s regeneration
: Neurologists tell me that my specific memory-problems (largely name-to-face) do very likely result from Asperger’s. However, means of improvement that allegedly work for such cases have not worked, so far, for me as concerns memory.
Merfilly27: if, eventually, you come to remember what you did all along, you could really shape yourself up that way by influencing early lives
Merfilly27: …and a silence falls on the room
Merfilly27: 🙂 LadyS122: how about the possibilty that what people remember isn’t so much, past lives that their soul has lived, but simply them tapping into the Cosmic thought and accidently recalling memories from that. (assuming there is such a thing.) LadyS122: 🙂
OscagneTX: Last time I tapped into something shared with the rest of humanity I got a fine for illegal drilling.
OscagneTX: %^) LadyS122:
DavidWrightSr: That would fit into the concept that all times coexist ‘simultaneously’ in some sense.
Merfilly27: Moebius Strip? LadyS122: Kate: My problem with that, is if you influence your past life, and affect the time of death, it will therefore, change the path of your soul. LadyS122: paradox
OscagneTX: I like the “balled up silk hanky” theory better.
DavidWrightSr: a 6 dimensional one.
AGplusone: Be scary if we wound up with a flatworm’s memory, every one of them ….
Merfilly27: I don’t want to tap into most of humanity’s experiences
AGplusone: including the modern day tapeworms.
AGplusone: that undoubtedly evolved from them as our ancestors did.
Merfilly27: It might just make that Accountant give you It’s job
OscagneTX: If the Almighty is so insecure that anything I could possibly do would discomfit It, It ain’t the Almighty.
Merfilly27: You know, that’s why I have a problem with the first five commandments
AGplusone: Didn’t think you’d like mine, Kate.
AGplusone: Although it would give you a chance, as we used to say, “to reach out and touch everybody.”
Merfilly27: Seen Bruce Almighty?
: Getting the Accountant’s job strikes me as better than getting a zillion lifetimes as something low and nasty because of having the temerity to Change Things that the Accountant Didn’t WANT Changed.
LV Poker Player: Maybe we can’t interfere, and that is the one Impossiblility that makes everything else possible?
OscagneTX: Me too.
LV Poker Player: Gold star to the first one to identify where I lifted that
Merfilly27: Or, your interference was planned for ahead of time?
starfall2 has entered the room.
Merfilly27: oops, no underline intended
AGplusone: Hullo Jackie
starfall2: hi kate
Merfilly27: hey Jackie
starfall2: i’m jackie
LV Poker Player: Not that I remember, but it’s possible, not one of the ones I have memorized. I definitely have something else in mind
AGplusone: But getting back to Heinlein … and time travel … I read something today, Joe. Michael Main’s website on which Main sez Gifford said the original Number of the Beast involved “time-travel” …. anything to it, Bill?
OscagneTX: the “original” NotB?
AGplusone: Probably more directly than what the current NOTB does with its three axis set up.
Merfilly27: the one he wrote before illness, then chopped for the new one
OscagneTX: I suppose the published version does, too, even if you don’t count WAM. It has Dora.
AGplusone: The orginal was the one he wrote when he was suffering from the transient brain disease he described in Spin Off, that when he finished, everyone said wasn’t publishable. So he put it aside.
OscagneTX: Does it resemble the published version at all?
BPRAL22169: I don’t think time travel specifically — all continuum travel is time travel, but not like specific.
AGplusone: Manuscript still exists so they say at UC Santa Cruz, and I think Bill said he glanced over it …. hence my question to Bill …
BPRAL22169: It was an early sketch of the 1980 version
Merfilly27: I feel I must go…Kevin has not had the use of our computer tonight and it nears his bedtime
Merfilly27: good night mes amis
Merfilly27 has left the room.
BPRAL22169: It had themhooking up with Dr. Lafe Hubert, but not with the Tellus Tertius family
AGplusone: I was sorta hoping for a preview of Maureen’s trip into 1930s Japan.
AGplusone: “Lafe Hubert” is one of Laz’ many alias.
BPRAL22169: About 40% of the book was on Barsoom, about 50% with Lensman Ted Smith.
LV Poker Player: All right, my “One Impossibility that permits all else to be possible” is from a novel, not a story. That was direct quote this time.
BPRAL22169: And the Black hats — Panki — were all the vermin there were.
AGplusone: He the one who was unfrocked because of the argument over eugenics in TEFL? Before the plague?
OscagneTX: She was her double. At least I thought that was the allusion.
BPRAL22169: Yes — the bit about finding a place with advanced medical facilities for the births occupied a much more prominent place. They ultimately
: The quote rings a Heinleinian bell … but I can’t remember WHICH bell! And, yes, “Dr. Lafe Hubert” lost his license over statements re eugenics (has this chat-group ever discussed that subject, by the way?)
BPRAL22169: decide not to stay in the Lensman universe because the War on Drugs was going on.
OscagneTX: Not specifically that I know of.
OscagneTX: Would you be interested in preparing that topic for a chat?
OscagneTX: (See David, I learn)
DavidWrightSr: Actually, not eugenics, I believe. He recommended sterilization of the unfit IIRC.
AGplusone: A long time back, yes, but even Dave doesn’t have the log on that. No reason not to do it once more.
BPRAL22169: How very last century.
DavidWrightSr: Even to those who had no other stigma except that they couldn’t support themselves.
BPRAL22169: I should get out “The Mismeasure of Man” again.
LV Poker Player: I wonder if they like Heinlein over in Archangel, Russia?
AGplusone: [I see, Joe. :-)]
OscagneTX: Eugenics actually seems like a pretty reasonable idea… until you get to “who decides”.
DavidWrightSr: But he came to his senses, and realized that nature would take care of them, “Stupidity is the only capital crime”.
OscagneTX: Um… have you seen the introduction post for this chat? All you really have to do is prepare the intro post, and then follow up by replying to the folks who reply to your intro.
LV Poker Player: It really does seem strange that no one can figure out my little puzzler. If I had posted it, I’m sure it would have been a matter of minutes before someone got it
OscagneTX: Rufo doesn’t have time for the actual chat, but he has good topic ideas and good preparation technique. I wish he could be here.
AGplusone: One goes through the RAH works, picks out a few touches on the subject and writes an essay for a lead-off post, and asks a lot of “what do you think” about the points RAH seemingly makes.
AGplusone: Then Oscagne uses it to post the lead off and we go on from there.
DavidWrightSr: And tries to keep the discussion on topic. O:-)
OscagneTX: Basically, you’d be a Stimulator as described in . . . TEFL? Sail?
OscagneTX: one of those.
AGplusone: To keep it on topic ….
OscagneTX: I usually space them out about a month. Maybe a little more. The way that works is, I look for a Thursday and Saturday that don’t conflict with someone’s holidays.
AGplusone: So you usually sandbag a few points to keep it or direct it back to the topic.
LV Poker Player: Must be a chatroom and a virtual bar are different lands when it comes to trivia questions
OscagneTX: Then I say, “Okay, lets do it xxxember the xxth and xxth.”
OscagneTX: Then you get the essay to me sometime in the next week or whenever you get the time.
AGplusone: We’re proving that more than two weeks lets the drift go too off course.
OscagneTX: yup. I’m going to cut down the lead time.
OscagneTX: And generally you shape the topic a bit by citing text, etc.
AGplusone: Good idea is to try to schedule two or three in advance so you can go from one to the other with the chat “co-hosts” or stimulators knowing when they’ll be ready to go ….
OscagneTX: Basically a pretty short school essay.
LV Poker Player: All right you guys, SIASL, Archangel Foster tells Archangel Digby that he can’t interfere
OscagneTX: I think we have one in the pipe, Rufo was working on one, I know. Would you like to tentatively schedule for Decemberish, Kate?
LV Poker Player: I was really expecting the references to strange and lands to jog someone’s memory
AGplusone: Might toss a little of the genetics from BTH into the mix, but up to you. If you don’t, someone else will …
AGplusone: It did, LV.
OscagneTX: Oooh, yeah. They have full-blown eugenics in that one, don’t they.
OscagneTX: Okay. You have my email?
starfall2 has left the room. LadyS122: Isn’t the licensing in I Will Fear No Evil based on genetics? since some people can get licenses, and others cannot?
AGplusone: Heh. Remember about the plan to keep generating the topic back on topic. Lot’s to bring up. thing is to keep the first post to reasonable bounds, so there’s something to talk about afterwards for the next two weeks.
starfall2 has entered the room. LadyS122: my book is in my daughter’s room.. don’t want to wake her uup to find it.
starfall2: i hate the campus network…
starfall2: what book?
OscagneTX: Kate… I’ve got your email from the log here. When You signed on it said: LadyS122: I Will Fear No Evil.
starfall2: umm… i might have it here
OscagneTX: If you would like your email edited out for the archive we can do that.
starfall2: what were you looking for in IWFNE? LadyS122: talking about whether they mention what they base the licenses to have children on. Since we know it wasn’t as simple as one child per adult… LadyS122: but they only mention it a couple of times, so it may not be worth the effort.
AGplusone: Licenses are in Podkayne too, of course.
starfall2: i don’t see any mention of what they base it on
AGplusone: Marlins win game 5, 6-4.
: Yes – and in TIME FOR THE STARS we also see licensing (the twins’ dad had fights with the government over this – I think they based the licensing on “too many people,” though [there & in FEAR NO], not on genes.)
OscagneTX: Well, we can make inferences, Jackie, because Eunice was so “desireable” she got a three-child license.
AGplusone: And the Fries were allowed 5.
DavidWrightSr: What about LL’s ‘killing a monster’ if necessary in TEFL with the Twins who Weren’t?
OscagneTX: And… during the trial they mention “This body” was licensed for 3. So maybe only women need licenses.
: If “desirable” in Eunice’s case had to do with genes, this supports my theory that she belonged to the Howards and had good-health genes that turned up on somebody’s scan (even though the Masquerade had not yet broken).
AGplusone: There you go … lots of citations for you essay next month, Kate. LadyS122: no.. because what’s his name… the Artist, wasn’t licensed to have any, so she couldn’t have any with him. LadyS122: I think.. LadyS122: it’s late and my brain is fuzzy LadyS122: and it’s been about a year since I read it.
AGplusone: Had a break yet, Joe? Maybe we could break then come back and finish the last hour.
LV Poker Player: I don’t know if this is ever mentioned, but if I were setting up such a system I would allow people to buy licenses, legally and aboveboard. The ability to make money is a survival trait
OscagneTX: yeah, but we save our “mutant” kids. Kids with birth defects are saved and every effort is made to give them normal lives. Would it be better to “space ’em”?
OscagneTX: That idea squicks me.
OscagneTX: We had a break, but we probably need another one.
AGplusone: I’ll hold the conn while you’re gone … ’cause I want to ask Bill about something.
DavidWrightSr: Well, it’s only 25 minutes before normal closing.
OscagneTX: It is moved! Resume at 11:45 Eastern.
starfall2: k LadyS122: I’m gonna go to bed… been sick and need rest.
OscagneTX: Have a good night. LadyS122: night
OscagneTX: Stop being sick!
AGplusone: Bill: about the photo portraits that are being produced? Is it a fund raiser for Santa Cruz?
DavidWrightSr: s’ pokoijnij nochi.
OscagneTX: At the moment, yes.
BPRAL22169: No, it’s a special project Rita has wanted to do for several years; now that he’s retired, she’s taking it up. LadyS122: Oscagne: My kids made me sick, it wasn’t my choice. Steph’s siblings have a lot to answer for, let me tell you. 🙂
AGplusone: Okay, are the prices low enough you think we could offer them as fundraisers ourselves?
OscagneTX: That’s what kids are for, right? LadyS122: yeah… if you say so. 🙂 LadyS122: night folks.
AGplusone: Taking into account shipping and mailing prices? LadyS122 has left the room.
BPRAL22169: Yes, the idea was that the few secondary distributors she selects will be able to use them to raise funds for themselves.. I thought of the tables at conventions and blood drives.
BPRAL22169: Rita some years ago had a high-resolution capture of the picture of Robert and Ginny on the set of Destination Moon
AGplusone: We’d want to take only a couple to Cons and take orders I suppose? then mail them out?
BPRAL22169: I don’t know — these are about the size of sheets of paper — no particular reason we couldn’t ship a supply
BPRAL22169: Take care of fulfillment on an impulse basis.
AGplusone: Second row down on the left.
starfall2: i’ve got to go… i’ve got homework to do and an 8 am class
starfall2: and i’m starting to fall asleep at my desk
starfall2 has left the room.
AGplusone: I’m having trouble getting the link into the room.
OscagneTX: I just took a quick google and didn’t find anything; are there any good sf cons near Houston?
DavidWrightSr: I had trouble too David. my old link on my desktop wouldn’t work and I had to have Os invite me in. Then I created a new shortcut.
OscagneTX: “the room” your link just worked for me. took me to the HS home page.
OscagneTX: My shortcut worked. And Kate found her way in without help.
AGplusone: Look under conventions, and look for ConJose, the visit to the Museum page, second down on the left.
BPRAL22169: I told rita once she had the basic information, she you and I should have a phone conference or online to swap information.
DavidWrightSr: Mine was an old aim:GoChat?RoomName=Heinlein+Readers+Group+chat
AGplusone: I can’t see the link going into the page in my roomscreen.
AGplusone: Another AIM “improvement”!
AGplusone: you’re in a chat room, Kate. It has a screen
AGplusone: the above just appeared in the screen
OscagneTX: She’s using iChat, David, on a Mac. So it looks very different from AIM
AGplusone: I know. I have it.
AGplusone: It still has a screen and a buffer
AGplusone: the buffer is where she types. the screen is where it appears.
OscagneTX: Okay… do you know why, when she joins, it lists her as “UnsupportedSN1”? And when she joins a ghost named “OnlineHost” also joins?
AGplusone: why I don’t use iChat
DavidWrightSr: Do you still see it Os?
DavidWrightSr: That’s strange. I don’t and haven’t seen it.
LV Poker Player: I don’t see what os is seeing
DavidWrightSr: Stupid question. You did get the MAC version and not the PC version I hope.
OscagneTX: Well…. if you’re really interested I could screenshot this and post it to a URL.
AGplusone: You have the log, Dave?
DavidWrightSr: Got it.
AGplusone: I’m going to sign off and see if I see it in iChat
AGplusone has left the room.
OscagneTX: We’re mostly doing admin stuff now, I think our chain of though vis a vis time travel has broken. We can adjourn the formal chat and deal with this unless someone has something else to say?
OscagneTX: Anyone? Bueller? Bueller? Anyone?
LV Poker Player: I don’t have anything new
AGplusone has entered the room.
AGplusone: Is this for the room?
LV Poker Player has left the room.
AGplusone: I’m here.
DavidWrightSr: You look normal to me.
OscagneTX: Okay. We are adjourned.
OscagneTX: You look normal to me too, David.
OscagneTX: And now she’s gone, but “OnlineHost” is still there.
BPRAL22169: Yeah. no difference I can tell.
AGplusone: I don’t see on-line host.
BPRAL22169: Do you need me to hang around?
AGplusone: who’s that?
AGplusone: Don’t have a name appended to it.
DavidWrightSr: I’m ready to call it a night. It’s been a long unproductive day.
OscagneTX: Not that I know of, Bill.
OscagneTX: You need to go?
BPRAL22169: Interesting. this is Bill
AGplusone: Must have been Bill. Yes, it is. No icon.
BPRAL22169: Not “need” but …
AGplusone: Although I see you in the room list.
OscagneTX: want? desire? yawning uncontrollably despite our blindingly interesting conversation?
AGplusone: curiouser. and why I don’t use iChat because of the differences.
OscagneTX: She had the same problem, David.
AGplusone: I show up as a custom icon.
OscagneTX: She found some setting that fixed it.
AGplusone: Not a name.
BPRAL22169: I’m going to e-mail something to David in pdf that will take some time to upload. (thepdfs of the MC noets)
AGplusone: Take care, Bill.
OscagneTX: Have a good night, Bill.
DavidWrightSr: There was an option like ‘Show names’ or something like that
AGplusone: My icon is a crest. Anyone see it?
OscagneTX: I don’t see any icons.
BPRAL22169: No, I’m getting the name printout, no icon.
BPRAL22169 has left the room.
AGplusone: Ah, okay. Take care all ….
DavidWrightSr: Log officially closed at 11:57 P.M. EDT
DavidWrightSr: Night David
AGplusone: Be interesting to read the log before I arrived …. Kate talks a bit doesn’t she?
OscagneTX: ‘night David.
DavidWrightSr: I didn’t get that part. That was before I joined
AGplusone: That’s because she probably didn’t register for AIM.
AGplusone: Or registered differently.
AGplusone: My guess
OscagneTX: But then, Online Host never went away. And when I got knocked off and got back on it was still there.
OscagneTX: Nobody else sees it?
OscagneTX: After all you guys leave, I’ll sign off and back on and see if its there.
DavidWrightSr: c ya later
AGplusone: Maybe it’s a guise to intimidate Unsupported SNs.
Final End of Discussion Log