Renovation

Beyond the required Annual Meeting, the Heinlein Society also spent considerable time and effort to create a strong presence at Renovation.

The Society’s Information Table was manned essentially all daylight hours of the convention.  As the Table was outside the secured room where Dealers, Exhibits, and Art Show were held, it had to be set up each morning and taken down each evening.  A number of fans stopped by the Table to pick up “I Grok Heinlein” badge ribbons, or information about the Society (with some on-the-spot renewals or new registrations), or candies from a never-empty bowl, or simply to talk about Heinlein.  In addition to professional authors such as Robert Silverberg and Gregory Benford, the famous radio personality Dr. Demento stopped by.

A set of paintings once owned and displayed by Robert and Virginia Heinlein in their home was lent to Renovation for display.  The paintings were by Chesley Bonestell, F. Kelly Freas, and Fred Ludekens.  President Sheffield took great care to safeguard the paintings by removing them for secure storage when the Art Show room was closed for the day, and re-positioning them each morning.

As a side note, also on display was the original cover art for the first paperback edition of Stranger In A Strange Land.

The Heinlein Blood Drive was held on the first day of Renovation, with mention in the massive convention Souvenir Book, but nothing on Wednesday’s daily program grid.  While donors sought out the Society’s Information Table, the conditions in combination led to a low and disappointing 12 units gathered.

On the final day of the convention’s programming, a panel titled “Stranger at 50” was offered on the 50th anniversary of the publication of Stranger In A Strange Land.  Playing a central role in the panel was official Heinlein biographer and first Society President Bill Patterson.

 

Posted in Conventions | Leave a comment

The Heinlein Society

Winter 2012 Newsletter: Latest issue now online! We’re converting to PDF newsletters delivered by email as our primary newsletter format. Please update your preferred email address here. Or request continued delivery of paper newsletters by mail.

Heinlein Society Blood Drive heart pinPay It Forward: This weekend… DunDraCon Blood Drive, San Ramon, CA, February 18, 2012 www.dundracon.com

Welcome new volunteers: New Blood Drives chair and new Twitter account leader

Posted in Frontpage | Leave a comment

Heinlein Society Scholarships

The Heinlein Society is pleased to announce that for the 2012-2013 academic year we will be offering the first of many scholarships. There will be two $500 scholarships awarded to undergraduate students of accredited 4-year colleges and universities majoring in engineering, math, or hard sciences (e.g. physics, chemistry), or in Science Fiction as Literature. Applicants will need to submit a 500-1,000 word essay on one of several available topics, including “How RAH affected my career choice” and “Discuss the importance of space exploration to the future of the human race.”

Application forms and submission information will be available shortly.

Posted in Education News, Notices, Scholarships | Leave a comment

PCA/ACA Heinlein Paper Award

The Heinlein Society is offering a $500 prize for the best Heinlein paper presented at the PCA/ACA (Pop Culture Association/American Culture Association) conference April in Boston. The 42nd Annual PCA/ACA National Conference will be held at the Copley Marriott Hotel in Boston from April 11 to 14, 2012.

The Popular Culture Association (“PCA”) with the American Culture Association (“ACA”) promote the study of popular culture throughout the world through the establishment and promotion of conferences, publications, and discussion. In 2004 organizer Lisa Edmonds (now Lisa Edmonds-D’Amico) formed a separate Heinlein Area out of the Science Fiction Area of the Popular Culture Association.

An account of the 2011 PCA/ACA Conference at The Heinlein Prize site

 

Posted in Education News, Notices, PCA/ACA Award | Leave a comment

Elisabeth Weir – Twitter Account Leader

Welcome to Elisabeth Weir who has volunteered to take the lead of the Heinlein Society’s new Twitter account!

Elisabeth is a web design and graphics professional, skilled in social media, and Heinlein Society member.

The Heinlein Society’s Twitter account is quite new and still growing. Interesting tidbits about Heinlein, including some Heinlein quotes you’ve never seen before, will be appearing regularly, along with Heinlein Society updates, news, and blood drives information.

If you have a Twitter account, be sure to Follow Us @heinleinsociety

Thank you, Elisabeth, for volunteering and Paying It Forward!

Elisabeth also created our Wearin’ of the Red graphic. Thanks, Elisabeth!

Family Meeting of 2012

 

Posted in Notices, Volunteers | Leave a comment

Scott Hann – New Blood Drive Chair

The Heinlein Society welcomes our new Blood Drive Chair, Scott Hann!

Scott HannScott is taking over management of the Heinlein Society’s extremely successful Blood Drives program. Under the long-time leadership and dedication of Mike Sheffield, and the donor-building skills of Alan Koslow, MD, the Heinlein Society’s blood drives have become some of the most successful in the entire United States. The DragonCon blood drive, in fact, may be the single largest, most successful, blood drive anywhere.

Scott Hann takes over overall management of the Heinlein Society blood drives after seven successful years volunteering to work at the GenCon blood drive.

Heinlein Society Wants YouScott lives in Indianapolis, Indiana, working for Xerox and writing. His first novel, The Red Menace,” was published three years ago. “It’s SF, set in 1950, lots of flying saucers and Martian spies,” Scott describes the novel. Of his new role as the Heinlein Society Blood Drive chairman, Scott says, “Each year I’ve worked at GenCon, I’ve gotten an incredible sense of accomplishment at the lives we’ve contributed to saving. Each one seems like a personal victory for me.”

Welcome Scott, and thank you for Paying It Forward!

Posted in Blood Drive Reports, Notices, Volunteers | Leave a comment

2011 10th Annual Membership Meeting

The Heinlein Society’s 10th Annual General Membership Meeting
by Keith G. Kato

The 10th Annual General Membership Meeting of The Heinlein Society was held at Renovation, the 69th World Science Fiction Convention, on Friday, 19 August 2011, 2:00 PM PDT, in Room D05 of the Reno-Sparks Convention Center, 4590 South Virginia Street, Reno, Nevada 89502-6013, U.S.A.

The following members of the Board of Directors were present: Michael Sheffield (President and Chairman of the Board of Directors); Keith Kato (Vice President-Secretary); Pamela Somers (Treasurer); Joe Haldeman (by proxy to Michael Sheffield); and Jerry Pournelle (by proxy to Keith Kato). Wearing their second hats as Committee chairs, Pamela Somers represented both Bylaws and Membership Services Committee, and Keith Kato represented the Social Activities Committee. An eventual total of 17 members (with late arrivals), including Directors, officers, and assigned proxies, were present.

This meeting was conducted pursuant to Article I, Section 3, of the By Laws of The Heinlein Society, ratified by written ballot of its Board of Directors on 13 December 2010, as amended.

Order of Business:

At 2:04 PM, PDT, Society President Sheffield called the meeting to order. The Agenda of the meeting is appended. The Order of Business was as follows:

(a) The signup roll of eligible voting members was taken by Treasurer Somers, showing 15 members present. Several members paid their 2011 dues in arrears by the time of (i.e., at the Society’s information table at Renovation) or at the meeting. The meeting was also witnessed by about five interested non-members.

(b) President Sheffield noted that a timely notice of the meeting had been presented via the Society’s website and in the July 2011 Society Newsletter, pages 5 and 18, to all members.

(c) President Sheffield inquired whether anyone had a proxy to present to the Vice President-Secretary and there was no response. Mr. Sheffield stated the Society’s postal box was checked before he departed for Renovation on 15 August 2011, and there were no proxies received. He also announced that, although Article II, Section 1 of the By Laws states that undesignated proxies of non-attending members can be used at the discretion of the President of the Society, this power would only be used to establish a quorum, and he would otherwise honor the votes of the attending membership.

(d) Copies of the 2011 Agenda and Minutes of the 2010 Annual Meeting of 27 November 2010, were distributed. President Sheffield offered to read the Minutes, or entertain a motion to waive the reading of the minutes.

Member Herb Gilliland moved to accept the Minutes as written. Member Joseph Martino seconded the motion, which unanimously 11 ayes, 0 nays, 0 abstentions.

(e) President Sheffield then gave his report, a de facto State of the Society summary:

• Since so few in attendance were at the 2010 Annual Meeting, he reminded everyone that he assumed office on 26 July 2010.

• He announced the efforts to reinstate the Society’s non-profit tax status at the Texas state and Federal levels.

• He discussed the Society’s on-going campaigns for higher visibility and outreach at future science fiction conventions. Vice President-Secretary Kato added the Society had one small effort to outreach to Heinlein-friendly libertarian groups, and was considering renewed outreach to the aerospace communities.

• The release at Renovation’s Education Workshop of the Society’s new Education CD, v. 2, containing the donated stories from SF authors Greg Bear, Gregory Benford, and David Brin, with lesson plans for these stories and the Heinlein juveniles by Dr. Robert James, was announced.

• The Society’s plan for a cash award at the Popular Culture Association for best Heinlein-related research paper was mentioned. Member Joseph Martino asked for clarification, and was told at the moment the mechanics of the award had not been worked out yet.

• The Society’s plan to award two $500 scholarships for college students was announced to begin in the 2012 academic year. That the mechanics of the scholarship solicitation and award process was also not worked out yet was mentioned.

• The Society’s tentative plans for the “Heinlein For Heroes” program was announced. Member Joseph Martino asked if this included electronic books, and was told “tentatively yes.” Member Carol Fyfe commented she thought this was a good idea, but asked if Canadian troops would be included. Vice President-Secretary Kato said the original Board motion was for distribution of Heinlein material to English-language-speaking troups. Member Edward Rom asked about logistics of the plan, and was told this was also not worked out yet. Non-member Valerie Johnson mentioned the use of U.S. postal flat rate boxes as carriers.

• He announced that Dr. Alan Koslow had assumed the duties of Blood Drive Committee Chairman, with updated news that about 3,200 units had been collected at the recent Dragon-Con under Dr. Koslow’s direction, which brought the Society’s ten-year total to over 10,000 collected units of blood in Robert and Ginny Heinlein’s names.

• President Sheffield then discussed some weaknesses or challenges the Society faces. Answering a question from member Robert Preisinger, Treasurer Somers said the Society had 206 active members. President Sheffield asked for volunteers to chair Blood Drives or Society presence at local SF conventions.

• He also mentioned the on-going campaign to create a Heinlein Center.

• Finally, he announced that a new Society website had been released about one week prior.

At this point, questions and comments were fielded from the attendees:

• Member Joseph Martino suggested news releases for the various campaigns underway.

• Member Brad Lyau asked if University of California, Santa Cruz was considered for the Heinlein Center, and was told no university site had been chosen yet.

• Member Gregory Benford suggested that a grant request to the Heinlein Prize Trust be made for outreach efforts such as the libertarian community.

• Member Joseph Martino suggested a collaboration between the Society and the Futurist Society at regional and world SF conventions.

• Member John Strickland noted the lack of space-related panels at SF cons, and asked if such panels could be sponsored by the Society. President Sheffield answered that panel topics suggested by the Society to convention committees are sometimes accepted, sometimes rejected.

(f) Vice President-Secretary Kato was asked if he had anything to report, but he had nothing to add.

(g) Treasurer Somers was asked for her interim fiscal year financial report, as the Society’s fiscal year began on 1 September 2010 and would not end until 31 August 2011. The Balance Sheet and Income Statement were distributed, and Treasurer Somers said in general that the Society’s cash position was 300% better than last year. She cited economies of operation such as the elimination of credit card user fees, financial support from the members, and about $15,000 from the Heinlein Prize Trust. She emphasized that about 25% of Society expenses out-of-pocket by members themselves. She also mentioned that the ledger assets of the Society had increased because the Bonestell-Freas-Ludekens paintings on display by the Society at Renovation had finally been appraised for insurance purposes, using the median of the appraised value ranges.

(h) The membership then considered the election of Directors for the Board. President Sheffield stated the three incumbent Directors, Jerry Pournelle, Pamela Somers, and himself, all stated their willingness to stand for office again. He mentioned that the By Laws were in the process of being re-written, which would eventually authorizing the use of electronic voting for the Board in a similar process to the Hugo and Nebula Awards. He mentioned again he would not invoke his power of proxy as President for non-attending members.

Member Fred Moulton moved to nominate Jerry Pournelle. At this point, Member John Strickland asked if there were any nominees besides the three incumbents, and was told “no.” Since there was no second to the nomination of Jerry Pournelle on the table, Member John Strickland moved that the three incumbents be nominated as a slate of candidates. This move was seconded by Member Alan Petrillo. This motion carried 15 ayes, 0 nays, 2 abstentions.

*****

Member Brad Lyau moved that the nominations be closed and a vote taken, which was seconded by Member Alan Petrillo. This motion carried 15 ayes, 0 nays, 2 abstentions.

Good of the Society:

The President opened discussions for the Good of the Society:

• Member John Strickland asked if his understanding of the various Heinlein-named prizes and awards was accurate—one by the National Space Society (miniature replica if “The Brass Cannon”), one by the Heinlein Prize Trust, and one granted by Dr. Yoji Kondo’s committee which is now executed by the Society. Member Fred Moulton asked that the Society’s website “disambiguate” [sic] the various awards.

• Member Gregory Benford announced his private bio-technology company had its origin with “Methuselah flies” from Michael Rose’s attempts to breed longevity in fruit flies, with cohorts now having lifespans 5½ times average. He credited Michael Rose’s inspiration for this research to the Heinlein novel Methuselah’s Children and derivatives therefrom.

• Member Joseph Martino suggested the Society enact and use an office of parliamentarian for future meetings.

• Member Carol Fyfe expressed her frustration that Canadian standards for blood donation seem overly restrictive. A follow-up comment was made by Member Alan Petrillo, who said he was unable to donate blood at the Heinlein Centennial, but made the effort to encourage others to donate.

With no other business pending,
It was moved by Member Fred Moulton that the meeting adjourn. The motion was seconded by Member Brad Lyau, and passed unanimously, 17 ayes, 0 nays, 0 abstentions.

President Sheffield adjourned the meeting at 3:28 PM, PDT.

Posted in Notices | Leave a comment

Dragon Con 2011 Blood Drive

Dragon Con 2011 Blood Drive

by Alan R. Koslow, M.D., F.A.C.S.

We came to Dragon Con 2011 with expectations of doing greater things than we have done in the past. Last year, we had 2546 donors donating a total of over 7200 units of blood product. This, we thought, may have been enough to be a United States record for single blood drive, however, it is hard to get those figures. We knew that the fans at Dragon Con are enthusiastic about the blood drive and are very caring and giving people so we had expectations that we could do even more. However while we had doubled the number of donors every year for the first eight blood drives, we knew that we could not double that number again. But we did not expect the overwhelming response we got. LifeSouth, the blood bank that does the blood drive for us increased their staff by about 15% from just under 200 to about 230. They actually took over an entire Holiday Inn Express renting 80 rooms in order to house their staff during the five days of Dragon Con. We were assigned the same space that we had last year at the Sheridan for both Thursday and Friday, where fans register for Dragon con. Over 40,000 people pass through registration on those two days and the Marriott for the entire five-day run of Dragon Con. Originally, registration was not supposed to begin until 2:00 p.m., so we had the blood drive set to start at 2:00 p.m. We discovered that the registration for pre-registered people was going to begin at 10:00 a.m., but it was too late to expand the hours of the blood drive. We probably lost about 400 to 500 people that could have donated if we have started it at that time. The blood drive that first day was scheduled to go until 11:00 p.m. meaning draws would happen until midnight.

On that first day, 28,000 people passed through registration. There was one point on Thursday evening at 5:30 where there were 116 people waiting online to register to donate blood, about 70 at the Sheridan and about 50 at the Marriott. On Friday morning when the manager of the blood drive for LifeSouth, Galen Unold, emailed everybody the numbers, we were just absolutely blown away that we did hit 800. Prior to this, the largest number of donors we had ever processed in a single day was 560. We were seeing hopes in our eyes for potentially 4000-donor blood drive this year. Alas logistics was not going to allow us to hit 4000, but we had 2944 donors giving close to 9000 units of blood products an increase of 22% over last year’s numbers.

The absolutely amazing thing was the fans and the enthusiasm that they showed for the blood drive. It has become part of the culture of Dragon Con. We have gotten tremendous support from Pat Henry, the Chairman of Dragon Con, and the entire staff at Dragon Con giving us almost everything that we need in order to become not just the most successful blood drive in science fiction fandom, but probably the most successful blood drive in the United States. Between 70% and 80% of the donors this year were repeat donors who had donated at the Dragon Con blood drive in previous years. This is an amazing statistic as most blood drives have 20-30% previous donors. Of note, this was our 10th blood drive, our 9th anniversary, so we have had time for this culture of donating blood to become organic to Dragon Con. It was amazing how many of the fans/donors said that their local blood banks were mad at them because they did not donate locally in July and August, so that they would be able to donate at Dragon Con.

I think they just wanted the T-shirts.

It almost seemed that going around the con and recruiting people to donate was unnecessary since most fans just planned it into their schedule; we hardly had to encourage them to do so. This was one of the things that warms the cockles of my heart to a degree that I cannot explain in words how enthusiastic and how giving the fans at Dragon Con are. It has been my routine to go to the large panels, which at Dragon Con would have between 1500 and 3000 people, and make an announcement about the blood drive before the panel would start. It was amazing how enthusiastic the people in these panels were. Then on Sunday and Monday, when I would ask people who had donated blood to raise the hand, the entire room of 2500 people would breakout into cheers and applause for those people who had donated blood. I could not walk 50 feet in the convention without someone asking me how the blood drive was going. The staff of LifeSouth who runs the blood drive was just absolutely amazing. They were great and did a fantastic job. The only real limitation that kept us from hitting 4000 donors was that of space on Friday, Saturday and Sunday. If we had one more large room, our lines waiting to donate blood would have been much less and people who came up and saw the long lines would not have walked away and we could easily over the four days have added 400 or 500 donors. Plus if we started at 10:00 a.m. on Thursday morning, with having average of 100 donors an hour on Thursday afternoon and evening, we could probably have added another 400 units. So it is very possible that next year we could actually hit 4000-4500 donors, which would be absolutely mind rocking.

I did something different at this year’s blood drive and that was trying to get people to do testimonials or promotions to encourage people to donate blood. These will be used by DC (Dragon Con) TV for next year to play in the 15 to 20 minutes while people waiting for a panel to start. They will also be used on the Dragon Con website to help promote the blood drive for next year. I was able to get over 150 testimonials, unfortunately about 20 of them did not come out well either because of lighting or sound, so I had over 130 usable testimonials, which included 37 TV/movie stars/celebrities, 21 by science fiction authors, 24 by fans at the convention and 31 by participants in the parade. We will be sharing these promos with you on the Heinlein Society and Dragon Con websites.

On the Monday morning before Dragon Con, Galen Unold e-mailed me and asked me if I could get volunteers to man the thank you table. We have never had volunteers before and I thought why not? So, I got in touch with Eugee Foster, who is the managing editor of the Daily Dragon and with her help, we posted a request for volunteers on all the forums from Dragon Con, within an hour of my getting that email from Galen. That afternoon, I had over 60 people who responded that they wanted to volunteer. Over the next 24 hours, emailing back and forth with these people, I was able to fill three people into every two-hour time slot between Thursday at 2 and Monday at 3 with the exception of approximately 18 of the 130 two-hour slots that I needed to fill. So on Wednesday morning, I had Eugee send out another notice and within two hours, we were able to fill all those slots. In total, I had 88 people who volunteered to work the blood drive and I used 35 of them.

I cannot tell you how amazing each and every one of those volunteers were, they came with a smile on their face, with enthusiasm, with joy in their heart and just absolutely had a great time giving out the juices and cookies, T-shirts, Heinlein pins and the Heinlein ribbons to every single person who donated blood. Everybody had a ball. Some of them walked around and did recruiting around the hotel. It was just absolutely amazing. I scheduled three people for each shift. There were some shifts that five and six people showed up just because they wanted to show up and see if they could help. I cannot tell you how fantastic that made me feel, and how great it was. We planned to continue this as a new tradition of volunteers for the thank you room of the blood drive, but I am also going to be contacting these volunteers who are big in fandom, they go to lots of different conventions and I will see if they want to organize blood drives at the conventions they go to that do not have blood drives. It is possible that we may be able to add from this new group of volunteers, members for the Heinlein society and also directors of blood drives at science fiction conventions all over the Southeast United States.

This was a fantastic year for the blood drive with a 20% to 25% increase in donors and units collected. We are not going to sit on our laurels, and next year we are going to make it even bigger and better. We are going to do several things to make next year better. Doing the promos gave me the idea to have a video promo contest. We will put out advertising and ask people to make a 30-second promo for next year’s blood drive. We will give out awards for the best one, two and three overall and we will also give awards for the best horror-related video, the best humorous video, and possibly a couple of other categories. As we just finished our 10th blood drive at Dragon Con, we will also look at this statistics and find the 10 fans from Dragon Con who have donated the largest number of blood and we are going to give a plaque to these people. We are going to have a magician that will come in to do balloon animals and do entertainments for the people while they are donating blood or while they are waiting on lines to donate blood. We will hopefully get the additional room and with the slight expansion of hours, be able to have between 4000 and 4500 donors.

I have done some amazing things in my life that I am very, very proud of. I have to tell you though that the Dragon Con Blood Drive has become probably one of the two or three things I am most proud of in my life. I have to also say that as I composed these last two sentences that I was getting tears in my eyes. I have not been able to donate blood for medical reasons for my entire life and so I feel that I am giving back a little bit by doing this. I am actually a vascular surgeon and so I am in a field that I probably uses more blood products than almost any other field. If I have a ruptured aneurysm, I might use up to 47 units of blood product without blinking an eye. I have actually had some trauma operations where I have used over 100 units of product. Running the Dragon Con Robert Heinlein Blood Drive has become one of the biggest highlights of my year and I look forward to the next one almost from the moment I leave Dragon Con.

I have taken over administrating the blood drives for the Heinlein Society around the country from Mike Sheffield. So if you want to start a blood drive in your local convention or if you feel I am not responding to you adequately, blame me not Mike, but please keep in touch with me and let me know how I can improve our service to you or how we can start a new blood drive at a new science fiction convention.

Thank you and I wish you all a great year and I look forward to sending you a report that is even more amazing, next year at Dragon Con 2012.

Sincerely yours,

Alan R. Koslow, M.D., F.A.C.S.

Posted in Blood Drive Reports | Leave a comment

Encountering the Heinleins by Michael Cassutt

On a windy Friday evening in late March 1977, I was a 22-year-old disc jockey and aspiring writer living in an apartment in Tucson, Arizona, when my telephone rang.  My girlfriend, Cindy, had driven to Phoenix that day to see her brother: I assumed Cindy was calling to tell me she had arrived.

Instead I heard a male voice on the line.  “Is this Michael Cassutt?”

“Yes.”

“This is Robert Heinlein.”

Heinlein readers can easily imagine my stunned reaction.  I had read all of Heinlein’s published science fiction by this time; he was by far my favorite writer in any genre, and the most influential.

He was also a semi-mythic figure, well-known and visible to the public until around 1966, the time I was devouring his books.  Then he became reclusive and even a bit mysterious for the next several years.

I had written him a fan letter in the summer of 1970, offering my thanks for Red Planet and The Moon is a Harsh Mistress and all the others, and wondering why there had been nothing new since 1966?  And why Mr. Heinlein was out of the public eye?

My letter was answered with a form letter and handwritten P.S. by his wife, Virginia, noting that her husband had been ill for much of the past year, but had a new novel about to be published (I Will Fear No Evil).  She added that he had appeared on the CBS broadcast of Apollo 11 in July 1969 — something I had forgotten.  (I was ill with pneumonia at the time.)

Soon thereafter, as I went off to college and acquired a subscription to Locus magazine as well as other contacts in the SF field, I would hear bits of information about Heinlein: he was still recovering from illness in 1971.  In December 1972, he and Ginny appeared on a cruise ship anchored off Cape Canaveral for the launch of Apollo 17.

I can remember my excitement at picking up a copy of Publisher’s Weekly in early 1973, and seeing a half-page announcement of a new Heinlein novel — Time Enough for Love: The Lives of Lazarus Long. [NOTE: The May 1973 hardcover had a slightly different type face and design than that in the early PW ad, omitting the subtitle.]

Heinlein “re-emerged” into the world in 1973, with the publication of Time Enough for Love, as well as the “unearthing” of his 1941 Worldcon guest of honor speech in Vertex magazine, which also published the first “new” Heinlein short story in years.   His 1973 Forrestal lecture at Annapolis was published in Analog.

I had sold a couple of short stories by then, one to an SF magazine, one to a mystery mag.  I attended the SFWA Nebula Awards event in Los Angeles in April 1974, where I saw Mr. and Mrs. Heinlein in person.

So by 1977, they were much less remote figures than they had seemed.

Blood Donor Card

Fan Blood Donor Card sent to the Heinleins, from the Heinlein Archives, courtesy of The Heinlein Prize Trust

Which is why, when I learned that Robert Anson Heinlein would be appearing at the Tucson SF Expo in conjunction with a blood drive, I wrote to 6000 Bonny Doon, Santa Cruz CA, and volunteered to be part of the team.

The Science Fiction Expo was a massively-ambitious event with guests ranging from Heinlein to Harlan Ellison, Robert Bloch, Jack Williamson, numerous other writers as well as film personalities (Johnny Weismuller) and astronauts (Pete Conrad).

I expected, at most, a post-card in return, perhaps directing me to the appropriate parties on the Expo committee.

I did not expect a telephone call from Mr. Heinlein himself, making me chairman of a committee of one.

Most of the ninety-minute conversation dealt with the mechanics of putting on the blood drive — the number and address of the local Red Cross office, the contacts there, questions to be asked, etc.  I dutifully took notes.

Naturally I managed to sneak in a couple of questions.  I had read that RAH had started work on a new novel the previous fall.  He said he was only “halfway through it,” and that he was trying to keep it from growing too long.  “I want to keep the hardcover price under ten dollars.”

He was concerned about the long drought in their area.  “Ginny’s having a tough time keeping her plants alive.”

I telephoned Cindy at her brother’s: “Guess who I was just talking to?”

Within a couple of weeks, I received a package from the Heinleins that included a photocopy of “Are You a Rare Blood?”, the RAH article from the Compton Encyclopedia Yearbook, and several pages of “Notes for a Handbook on Blood Drives at SF Conventions,” dated from January 1 to January 14, 1977.

By then I had already followed Mr. Heinlein’s instructions, had contacted the appropriate local Red Cross officials as well as the chairman of the SF Expo.  My job in radio made it relatively easy to arrange for public service announcements, which I recorded and sent around to other stations.  I kept the Heinleins apprised of the planning by letter.

The looming problem was this: the SF Expo team had wildly over-estimated its attendance.  They had predicted that 5,000 people would come to Tucson that June — this at a time when few, if any, World SF Conventions could claim that many attendees.  Yes, there were Star Trek cons on that scale — but this was not a Trek con.  Nor was it being held, like the giant Trek events, in a major city.

Even the date was a problem: the University of Arizona, with its 30,000 students, ended its term in mid-May, three weeks before the Expo.  How many attendees were lost because of that?

It was obvious by early May that attendance at the SF Expo would be a fraction of the hoped-for figure — 500, not 5,000.

This presented obvious financial problems for the expo committee.  It also meant that the blood drive wasn’t going to get that hundred units.  Or even 70.  Or 50.

I wrote to the Heinleins warning them.  Ginny responded that they had been hearing of problems with the Expo, but that they were committed to an appearance at a smaller event in Phoenix the weekend prior, and were still planning to come to Tucson.

And they did, arriving on the afternoon of Wednesday, June 1, 1977, and checking into the Tucson Marriott.  I received a call at the radio station that afternoon, inviting me over.

I walked into the Heinlein suite, and found myself face-to-face with Robert and Virginia, but with Jack Williamson and G. Harry Stine, too.  Elizabeth Brown, the widow of Fredric Brown, was also present.  There were certainly others, probably twenty in number, none of whom I knew personally.  Sensing this, Mr. Heinlein introduced me to Jack Williamson and Harry Stine.

The impromptu party broke up around four, at which time Mr. Heinlein suggested that we check out the facilities for the next day’s blood drive.  Which we did.

Then he invited me to join Ginny and him for dinner.  “Invite your girlfriend, too.”

In fact, I telephoned Cindy from the Heinleins’ suite:  “Guess who wants you to come to dinner?”

Although I had found Heinlein, in 1974, to be older than his years, slow of speech and unsteady on his feet, in June of 1977 he seemed more vigorous — deliberate and precise in manner, but witty and energetic.  Although he was pale (“I have skin cancer, so I have to stay out of the sun”), he seemed healthy.

Ginny was white-haired, but still slim and striking.  She was protective of her husband, helping to move him along when fans loomed, offering reminders of phone calls to be made, people to be met.  She was also a bit humorless.  (On a couple of occasions throughout the weekend Mr. Heinlein made jokes that seemed to go right by her.)

Both Heinleins smoked cigarettes.

Cindy arrived at the suite, and we ordered hamburgers and beer from room service.  For the next several hours, the four of us simply talked.  (For some reason, I never for a moment considered asking Mr. Heinlein for an interview.  Selfish of me.)  Much of it was simple social chatter — where were Cindy and I from, where did we work, etc?  The Heinleins spoke of their own health struggles.  At one point Robert tapped his teeth and said, “These are still mine.  Arthur Clarke has a mouth full of false choppers.”

Torn between my desire to prolong the evening, but mindful of the danger of wearing out my welcome, I kept an eye on the clock.  Somewhere around eight-thirty I decided I had imposed enough.  Cindy and I excused ourselves, thanked our hosts, and drove off into the night.

But what a magical afternoon and evening it was.  The next morning, before heading back to the Expo for the blood drive, I sat down at my typewriter in the office of radio station KHYT, and made the following notes:

• Heinlein’s one and only try for political office took place in Los Angeles in 1938.  Dorothy Parker was one of the contributors to his campaign.

• The novel Sixth Column, based on a story by John W. Campbell titled “All,” was written in Chicago in 1940.  RAH says he needed the money to buy a car and “get the hell out of Chicago”.

• Space Cadet was written in Fort Worth, Texas, in 1947.

• Heinlein’s health gave him problems during World War II.

• Heinlein’s last stint in Hollywood was around 1965 [actually, early 1964].  The project [XXII Century] never materialized and the producers “moved across the street and made Batman, and made a fortune”.

• Heinlein referred to The Worlds of Robert A. Heinlein, published by Ace in 1966, as a “bottom of the barrel collection” and is trying to get the rights back.  He is scrupulous about having rights to his earlier material reverted to him — in some cases, so he can see that it is never published again.

• Mrs. Heinlein says that the pseudonym her husband used for his teenaged romances from the 1950s was “R. A. Heinlein”.  [Note: Why didn't I search out the stories? I had no idea what magazines the stories had appeared in.]

• On baseball: I had mentioned Manny’s off-hand references to the Yankees in The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress: “I stopped paying attention to baseball around 1927.”

• On critics: I had asked if he really thought that no critic had written anything insightful about his work. “Of course not.” He then cited David Samuelson’s then-recent article about the Future History stories [NOTE: Samuelson spoke to RAH while preparing the paper,   "Major Frontier Worlds of Robert A. Heinlein: The Future and Fantasy," originally published in Voices for the Future, Thomas D. Clareson, Ed.  Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green University Popular Press, 1976.  Reprinted in Robert A. Heinlein, Joseph D. Olander and Martin Harry Greenberg, Eds.  New York: Taplinger, 1978 ]

• On book reviews:  RAH published three reviews in Astounding during World War II.  [I went looking for these in the University of Arizona library, which had an excellent SF collection from the estate of Fredric Brown, but was unable to find the pieces.  Year later I learned that they were not listed on the contents pages of the magazines in question.]

• The Heinleins’ house located 15 miles north of Santa Cruz in the mountains (1200 feet), yet it commands a view west to the Pacific. The property includes an orchard and is surrounded by an electrified fence. The house itself is circular, with battlements.  Interior features include built-in furniture and sound system.

• “The Black Pits of Luna” was written in four days, and sold to Saturday Evening Post for $4,000, astounding money for 1948, and pretty good for 1977.

• I mentioned the writer James Oberg, who had been publishing articles in Analog.  “Oberg writes a good stick,” he said, a comment I was happy to pass along to a very happy James Oberg.

The blood drive took place on Thursday, June 2, 1977, and went very smoothly. The only negative was the number of units we got — 35 rather than the 50 we had hoped.  Because the event had raised awareness of the need for blood donations, the Red Cross professed itself satisfied, and so did the Heinleins. (They were interviewed on local television and radio throughout the weekend, and took at least one side trip to the University of Arizona medical center to tour facilities.)

The Heinleins remained in Tucson for the balance of the Expo, and hosted a party on Saturday night in their suite.

Cindy and I were present, off and on, for much of the Expo, too.  Other incidents I witnessed: at the Saturday night party, one of the convention volunteers, a young woman, asked RAH why he and Ginny didn’t have children. I expected a bit of Heinlein frost — instead, he simply shrugged and said, “We wanted them, but they never came.”

At the close of one of the afternoon panels, Mr. Heinlein wanted to talk to astronaut Pete Conrad, who was at that moment surrounded by autograph seekers.  He turned to me and said, “Do you know if Conrad’s rank is captain or a commander?”

“Retired captain.”

“You’re sure?”

The one thing I knew better than Heinlein’s work was astronauts. “Absolutely sure.”

Mr. Heinlein turned away and said in a voice that could only be described as commanding: “Captain Conrad!”

Pete Conrad, the third man to walk on the Moon,  instantly rose into the air and spun to face Mr. Heinlein: “Yes, sir!”

The weekend was as exhausting as it was fascinating.

In December 1977, I mailed Ginny a report on the failed blood drive — “The Best Laid Plans” — intended for publication in the proposed blood drive handbook. She responded that she and Robert were about to leave on a trip that would last until mid-January.

A year after the Expo I would have another lengthy telephone conversation with RAH (he had called me on some SFWA business), then would see Ginny again at the Phoenix WorldCon. (RAH was then recovering from brain surgery and not yet cleared for air travel. He was, Ginny said, well enough to drive himself into Santa Cruz and take in a movie…)

I would see them again — briefly — at space development conferences in 1982 and 1983, and kept up a sporadic correspondence with Ginny until the late 1990s.

Robert and Ginny skating

Copyright the Heinlein Archives, courtesy of The Heinlein Prize Trust

On the last day of the convention, as night fell, Cindy and I grabbed dinner at an outdoor café. “Look,” she said. “Isn’t that the Heinleins?”

There, walking hand-in-hand, were Robert and Virginia, Robert in a blue blazer and white slacks, Virginia in a summer dress. They were not just walking, but almost gliding, as if ice-dancing.

Sure enough, when they reached a vantage point that gave them a view to the west, where the sun was setting over “A” mountain, Robert took Ginny’s hand and twirled her.

And that is how I will always remember them.

Michael Cassutt

Posted in Heinlein, RAH and Me | Leave a comment

Review of the Heinlein Biography: Learning Curve

Review of Robert A. Heinlein: In Dialogue with His Century: Vol. 1: Learning Curve: 1907-1948

By Robert James, Ph.D.

“At Long Last…”

Heinlein biography coverLet me be honest: there is really no way that I can be objective about this book. First of all, this is an unprecedented biography in the science fiction field; nobody has ever really produced anything like its devotion and depth of a Golden Age of Science Fiction writer. Wells and Burroughs, yes; Clarke and Bradbury have had largely failed attempts, which stopped at single volumes. Other writers have had reasonable biographies written of them, including Alice Sheldon and Anne McCaffrey in recent years, but those remain preliminary coughs (the Tiptree biography is good, but feels incomplete to me, and to at least one major SF writer, who complained that the author hadn’t even bothered to talk to the CIA about Sheldon’s employment there). The new H. Beam Piper and C.M. Kornbluth biographies are worth reading, but marked by amateurism and unanswered questions.

I exclude Asimov’s extensive autobiography from comparison, but then, the man never did stop talking about himself, with charm and joy. There were very few secrets kept behind the public stage, and those have been revealed since his death in various places.

But Robert Heinlein deliberately hid his private life from his public, and then bedazzled us for decades with his fiction, an enchantment that remains, one assumes, for those reading these words.

We have always wanted to know the facts.

Which leads me to my second reason why I can’t be objective: I know too much. Having been involved in the research, both tangentially and deeply, I know how much has made it in, and what was left out, and why. Whatever I might have to say about the book is going to be tempered by my firsthand knowledge of the decade of work that went into its writing, rewriting, editing, and presentation to the public. I was a reader of the original manuscript, an early critic of its faults and omissions, a sometimes thorn in the author’s side for more than one issue.

And there’s the third reason: the author is one of my best friends, my co-writer, my editor, my constant correspondent, occasional passenger and dinner guest (not usually at the same time), and I have nothing but the deepest respect and camaraderie for him, both personally and professionally.

So, that said, let me make a desperate attempt to be objective, and to somehow avoid the accusation of writing a puff piece.

Let’s start with this: this should have been me writing this book. Bill got to Ginny Heinlein a handful of weeks before I did, and I shall never forgive him for being smarter, faster, and more prescient than I in somehow tricking Ginny into asking him to write the book.

The bastard is just slippery that way. I’ve had to get used to it over the years. You will too.

Ah, well. I grit my teeth, and I say this: It’s a far better book than I would have written, and done far sooner than I could have done it. Bill has devoted his life to this project, while I had to go off and procreate. Twice. Diapers and homework and my refusal to ignore my children would have doomed me.

But that title….Oh. My. God. Love that “Learning Curve”, but the rest? Bill clung to that title, in all its glorious awkwardness and utility, as a means of connecting with readers down through the years who would not know who Heinlein was if they didn’t see him talking with his century. Bill is stubborn that way; once he has his teeth on the bit, he won’t let go until the ride is completed. Bill, you won the battle of the title; I will just have to content myself with saddling you with long and cumbersome titles on every article I write for you in petty revenge.

And if the biography has another flaw, it is an almost complete lack of critical analysis. Bill himself has agonized over that, and it has been a complaint from several reviewers. But had he included the critical analysis of the works, we’d be in 1941 at the end of volume 1, and looking forward to three more volumes, instead of just one. This is a measure of how important Heinlein is….and how much Bill has to say about the subject. (Stay tuned; Bill and I are writing a critical analysis of the Heinlein canon as our next joint project…I intend to title it myself…).

There are minor nitpicks to be made, and Bill has been mortified by how many silly small errors crept in over the years. He has posted a list of them on his author’s website, and a discussion of them can be found on the Nexus Forum on the Heinlein Society website. None of them are major, and only a small handful concern Heinlein himself. One of the great strengths of the biography – and something Bill worked on extensively in the editing process – is its intensely convincing rooting in the documentary evidence. Whatever speculation remains in the book is minimal, and duly noted in the endnotes, which are copious and well-worth reading in and of themselves.

The book reminds me of no other work so much as Carlos Baker’s famous biography of Ernest Hemingway. For decades, it was the single inescapable biography. I suspect this biography will gain the same status as well, even as a wealth of new information is revealed as a result of its publication. I recall years ago hearing Ella Fitzgerald’s biographer complain on NPR that the problem with biography is that all the good stuff comes out after the book is published, as people come forward with new information and evidence both anecdotal and otherwise. Bill has already been contacted by those who witnessed some of the events in this book, and still survive – previously unbeknownst to him, or anybody else involved in Heinlein research. A revised edition is unlikely, but already seems necessary, given the wealth of new data. Note to Bill: I would also love to see a greater sense of context, particularly of the early days, of the Progressivism of his childhood, and the culture of Missouri and Kansas City and Los Angeles, in the revised edition.

Without delving into the summary that seems to be the mainstay of reviewers of this book – why is it so few of them seem to be able to say anything other than telling readers the plot, or making inane comments that seem to reveal their own failed reading skills? – I would say that this biography is very capable, readable, and compelling. I found myself engrossed in reading the uncorrected proofs (indeed, I stole the author’s copy to do so….), despite my repeated involvement from the earliest days of the manuscript. There is a clarity of presentation now, which was at times lacking in earlier drafts. Rewriting, as great writers know, is the heart of writing.

The Robert Heinlein that emerges from these pages is, indubitably, the one we expected. Only more so. His time at the academy, and serving with the Navy, is particularly well-executed. The surprises of his first love, his first wife, and the marriage to Leslyn are all relatively complete, given the destruction of much of the evidence by Heinlein after the collapse of his private life after WWII. (time travelers, please make a note: break into Heinlein’s house when he is in Philadelphia during WWII, and make complete copies of all the correspondence, poetry and other paraphernalia stored in the room above the garage in the Laurel Canyon home.) The divorce from Leslyn, the courtship with Ginny, and the changes of the writing career are particular strengths. The pictures are revelatory.

In short, I cannot imagine a Heinlein fan who will be disappointed in the book, other than having to wait for volume 2, which is going to be difficult. Good news: the editing has already commenced, and should prove to be a shorter wait than the decades we endured for the first volume.

Now, pardon me. I’m going to go read it again. And plot my revenge on the man for getting to Ginny first. And for writing such a damn good book, thus making it highly unlikely anyone will ask me to write a new version for at least two decades. And for cooking better than me. And dressing better than me. And having more hair than me. And owning Heinlein’s hats. And…and….and. Oh, forget it. He’ll just foil my plots anyways.

He’s that good.

Dammit.

Author Bill Patterson is currently working on the Volume 2 editing

Posted in Heinlein, Reviews | Leave a comment