View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Wed Dec 13, 2017 7:10 am



Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
The DC-X Lives! 
Author Message
Heinlein Nexus
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 8:10 am
Posts: 2232
Location: Pacific NorthWest
Post The DC-X Lives!
Where have I seen this before?


Mon Jul 08, 2013 7:30 pm
Profile WWW
PITA Bred
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 12:17 pm
Posts: 2401
Location: The Quiet Earth
Post Re: The DC-X Lives!
Unless you meant to link to an article about prison strikes, the link is bad.


Tue Jul 09, 2013 5:29 am
Profile
NitroForum Oldster
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 7:57 am
Posts: 669
Location: DC Metro
Post Re: The DC-X Lives!
I was expecting an article about the DC-10.

_________________
"Being right too soon is socially unacceptable." - Heinlein, Expanded Universe


Tue Jul 09, 2013 7:54 am
Profile WWW
Heinlein Nexus
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 8:10 am
Posts: 2232
Location: Pacific NorthWest
Post Re: The DC-X Lives!
Oops, paste fail. Edited. Try again please.


Wed Jul 10, 2013 5:18 am
Profile WWW
NitroForum Oldster
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 7:57 am
Posts: 669
Location: DC Metro
Post Re: The DC-X Lives!
That is so freaking completely awesome. Seems to go a long way toward realizing Heinlein's vision of single-stage rocket ships.

Thanks for sharing.

_________________
"Being right too soon is socially unacceptable." - Heinlein, Expanded Universe


Wed Jul 10, 2013 5:35 am
Profile WWW
PITA Bred
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 12:17 pm
Posts: 2401
Location: The Quiet Earth
Post Re: The DC-X Lives!
Way cool to watch, but two words occur to me: fuel costs.

The problem with this kind of design is that as much fuel, or more, is required for landing as for takeoff. I can't envision a working model that would have a meaningful payload and carry enough fuel for even a single takeoff and landing with safety reserves.

Until and unless we develop propulsion systems with much greater delta-vee per pound, unpowered descent and landing will be the only workable spaceflight option.

I know, I'm such a wet blanket.


Wed Jul 10, 2013 6:23 am
Profile
Heinlein Nexus
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 8:10 am
Posts: 2232
Location: Pacific NorthWest
Post Re: The DC-X Lives!
JamesGifford wrote:
Way cool to watch, but two words occur to me: fuel costs.


Very logical argument, but... SpaceX is perfectly capable of making the cost benefit calculations. Either they're doing this solely for gee-whiz PR, or they have something up their sleeve.


Wed Jul 10, 2013 11:39 am
Profile WWW

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 12:42 pm
Posts: 128
Location: Northern VA
Post Re: The DC-X Lives!
That better be a big sleeve. :lol:

_________________
OJ III


Wed Jul 10, 2013 2:21 pm
Profile
Centennial Attendee
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 10:46 am
Posts: 541
Location: Aurora, IL, USA, Terra
Post Re: The DC-X Lives!
JamesGifford wrote:
Way cool to watch, but two words occur to me: fuel costs.

The problem with this kind of design is that as much fuel, or more, is required for landing as for takeoff.

It's a rocket. When it is landing, the propellant it took off with is long gone. Therefore, by the cruel equation of Tsiolkovsky, the thing that's landing weighs much less than the thing that took off. Correspondingly less propellant is needed.

Quote:
I can't envision a working model that would have a meaningful payload and carry enough fuel for even a single takeoff and landing with safety reserves.

I agree that this is a quantitative question. But wings weigh something, and parachutes weigh something. If the tradeoffs against these are favorable, then hauling landing propellant along all the way through the mission might possibly be the right answer. Certainly some engineers have thought so.

Even a Soyuz lands by firing retrorockets at the last moment of its parachute descent. Which is nothing like the kind of vehicle we're discussing-- but it does indicate that someone thought it worthwhile to carry solid-fuel rockets all the way into orbit and back.

If memory serves, the never-built descendants of the DC-X, when returning from orbit, were expected to use the atmosphere to slow down to a modest speed, as capsules and Shuttles do, but to conduct a powered tail-first landing.

I have an open mind on the question.

_________________
Bill Higgins
bill.higgins@gt.org
http://beamjockey.livejournal.com


Wed Jul 10, 2013 3:57 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 9 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF