View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Wed Nov 26, 2014 4:30 am



Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Review, kinda 
Author Message

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:53 am
Posts: 555
Post Review, kinda
Not sure if this belongs here, but if it belongs somewhere else, please move it:

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/ ... se-wooster


Sat Nov 19, 2011 5:33 pm
Profile
Heinlein Nexus
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 8:10 am
Posts: 2116
Location: Pacific NorthWest
Post Re: Review, kinda
Good catch, sir.


Sat Nov 19, 2011 5:51 pm
Profile WWW

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:53 am
Posts: 555
Post Re: Review, kinda
PeterScott wrote:
Good catch, sir.


Don't follow you, Peter. How so?


Sat Nov 19, 2011 7:01 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 2:10 pm
Posts: 407
Location: Juneau, AK
Post Re: Review, kinda
In a positive way, I believe. Interesting review. I did some searching a few months back and found several reviews but not this one. Thanks for pointing it out.

_________________
"There comes a time in the life of every human when he or she must decide to risk 'his life, his fortune, and his sacred honor' on an outcome dubious. Those who fail the challenge are merely overgrown children, can never be anything else."


Sun Nov 20, 2011 11:09 am
Profile
PITA Bred
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 12:17 pm
Posts: 2400
Location: The Quiet Earth
Post Re: Review, kinda
*sigh* Same canned, programmatic and ronngg analysis of RAH that's been spouted for years, now new and improved. See, Heinlein wasn't actually a liberal in his early days... he just "thought of himself as" one. And then swung over/changed/came out of the closet because he married a right-thinking woman.

Wake me when there's something new, in either mainstream comments about Heinlein or conservative punditry in the foxblock era.

_________________
"Hier stehe ich. Ich kann nicht anders." - Luther
In the end, I found Heinlein is finite. Thus, finite analysis is needed.


Sun Nov 20, 2011 11:13 am
Profile
Heinlein Nexus
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 8:10 am
Posts: 2116
Location: Pacific NorthWest
Post Re: Review, kinda
I believe Katherine Hepburn said that she didn't care what the press printed about her as long as it wasn't true. So in one sense any mention of Bob is a plus.


Sun Nov 20, 2011 5:10 pm
Profile WWW
PITA Bred
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 12:17 pm
Posts: 2400
Location: The Quiet Earth
Post Re: Review, kinda
PeterScott wrote:
So in one sense any mention of Bob is a plus.

Only insofar as it will sell a few more books for the Estate. Goldwyn was right, but only as long as you're talking about selling something. Even the most negative review or notice will move a few more books or movie tickets or something.

Just maybe things eventually move beyond "selling something," eh?

There's nothing more to gain by selling a few more copies of Stranger. No one including the world at large gains anything from yet another characterization of WC Fields as a bumbling drunk, Einstein as a featherbrained kook, Jack Benny as a miser... or Heinlein as any of the half-thought, mostly-wrong caricatures that keep getting tossed out despite the meticulous detail of the biography that this idioto-con apparently never actually read.

Shock shock surprise... someone writing for a polarized venue writes a review that simply promotes their own ingrained ignorance and preconceived notions. And silly-ass me, I keep hoping for better.

_________________
"Hier stehe ich. Ich kann nicht anders." - Luther
In the end, I found Heinlein is finite. Thus, finite analysis is needed.


Sun Nov 20, 2011 6:28 pm
Profile

Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:53 am
Posts: 555
Post Re: Review, kinda
Love it, James. I posted the link because I knew it would spark discussion.
So what was the old boy? Socialist, libertarian, what? The only thing we know for sure was that he was Republican, because he said so. (Hum, just set myself up, having called Republicans liars. But RAH never held office.)


Sun Nov 20, 2011 8:36 pm
Profile
PITA Bred
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 12:17 pm
Posts: 2400
Location: The Quiet Earth
Post Re: Review, kinda
You've been around here long enough that you should know the answer - at least, better than to ask such a generically-phrased question.

The very short answer is that Heinlein's political philosophy appears to have remained remarkably consistent throughout his adult life. His compass was steady; it was the winds that changed around him. For this to make sense, you have to have a grasp of the fact that terms like "liberal," "conservative," "Republican" and "Democrat" (not to mention "socialist" and the Scottish Political Orientation) change meaning over time, sometimes radically. There is far less difference between Heinlein the 1930s "social democrat" and Heinlein the 1970s "libertarian" than there is in the meaning and interpretation of those labels over that time span. You have to keep in mind that when you're talking about "what Heinlein was" you're talking about a mercurial and hard to interpret figure over some 50 years of his life and during one of the most tumultuous eras - or several of them - in our history. There is no simple, one-label, meaningful answer because the labels and the context shifted several times in that span.

But no, lazy idiotlogues fumbling for a convenient metaphor to bolster their limited concepts keep reaching for that old, dull "RAH was liberal until he growed up and/or his second wife warped/shamed him into being a reactionary" saw. Even when the big, fat book they supposedly just read makes the real case clear.

Just proves that being able to write at the National Review level doesn't indicate an ability to read past sixth grade level.

_________________
"Hier stehe ich. Ich kann nicht anders." - Luther
In the end, I found Heinlein is finite. Thus, finite analysis is needed.


Mon Nov 21, 2011 5:28 am
Profile

Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:52 pm
Posts: 128
Post Re: Review, kinda
This National Review piece says more about NR's own decline than about anything else. I'm a liberal myself but still recognize that when Wm. F. Buckley was around, the magazine was primarily about ideas and justified its own existence. But something like this - "Hm, let's see whether we can tag a well-known writer as a conservative, so that he can be made a Member of the Tribe, at least in retrospect" - is spurious on its face.

I would also note here that Isaac Asimov, not easily characterizable as a "lazy ideologue," said the same thing about the influence of Virginia: "Robert Heinlein, however, who was a burning liberal during the war, became a burning conservative afterward, the change coming at about the time he swapped wives from the liberal Leslyn to the conservative Virginia." (I. Asimov, p. 311 of the paperback; the next sentence is "I doubt that Heinlein would call himself a conservative, of course.")


Mon Nov 21, 2011 11:20 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF