Prophets of Science Fiction
| Author |
Message |
|
RobertPearson
Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 2:10 pm Posts: 297 Location: Juneau, AK
|
 Re: Prophets of Science Fiction
I saw the 2001 movie in 1983--went down that psychedelic flashing light tunnel scene and when I woke up it was December 31, 1999. I don't know how they did that but I need the kind of help Dan Davis got in Door Into Summer.
_________________ "There comes a time in the life of every human when he or she must decide to risk 'his life, his fortune, and his sacred honor' on an outcome dubious. Those who fail the challenge are merely overgrown children, can never be anything else."
|
| Wed Mar 21, 2012 4:44 pm |
|
 |
|
PeterScott
Heinlein Nexus
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 8:10 am Posts: 1871 Location: Pacific NorthWest
|
 Re: Prophets of Science Fiction
Interesting concept but Heinlein and Clarke are like oil and vinegar. To have a three million-year flash forward of life evolving from primordial sludge interrupted by bacchanalian orgies would just be wrong.
|
| Thu Mar 22, 2012 5:34 pm |
|
 |
|
Blackhawk
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2010 8:51 pm Posts: 158 Location: Alabama, USA
|
 Re: Prophets of Science Fiction
You're right, of course. Still, though Clarke was good for the big ideas, nobody tells a story like Heinlein. 2001 sure could have used some of that story telling ability. I wonder if the real oil and vinegar mix wouldn't have been Heinlein and Kubrick.
_________________ Dan Thompson
|
| Thu Mar 22, 2012 6:50 pm |
|
 |
|
TexasScot1952
NitroForum Oldster
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2008 9:55 am Posts: 73 Location: DFW, Texas
|
 Re: Prophets of Science Fiction
I finally got to see several episodes of this series this weekend and I was very disappointed. The only high point was the brief clip of RAH talking to Cronkite. 
|
| Mon Jul 02, 2012 5:47 am |
|
 |
|
JamesGifford
PITA Bred
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 12:17 pm Posts: 2314 Location: The Quiet Earth
|
 Re: Prophets of Science Fiction
POS(F) was an immense disappointment, but then, the 'history' and 'science' and 'sf' channels have all bombed out big time when it comes to delivering what they originally promised. 90% or more of their programming is glorified by calling it drivel.
Let's start with the feyly renamed SyFy, which, from what I see from a distance, appears to a be a spindle for an endless number of ghost-hunter shows.
Everything else has fallen for endless iterations of these formulaic 'history' shows which are comprised of a slightly silly take on a person or topic and filled out with equal parts cheezeball 'reenactment' and bottom-scraping talking-head time. In the end, we've seen 22 minutes or so of moving images and about three paragraphs of content. And it's EVERYWHERE.
I just would have expected more from Ridley Scott. Guess nott.
_________________ "Hier stehe ich. Ich kann nicht anders." - Luther In the end, I found Heinlein is finite. Thus, finite analysis is needed.
|
| Mon Jul 02, 2012 6:29 am |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|